2021
DOI: 10.3390/polym13060846
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fouling and Chemical Cleaning of Microfiltration Membranes: A Mini-Review

Abstract: Membrane fouling is one of the main drawbacks encountered during the practical application of membrane separation processes. Cleaning of a membrane is important to reduce fouling and improve membrane performance. Accordingly, an effective cleaning method is currently of crucial importance for membrane separation processes in water treatment. To clean the fouling and improve the overall efficiency of membranes, deep research on the cleaning procedures is needed. So far, physical, chemical, or combination techni… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
87
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
3
87
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the pH generated by the addition of calcium hydroxide during the nixtamalization process resulted in a high alkalinity (>12), the pH values progressively decreased compared to the initial extract. In the MF process, the pH decreased between 0.7 and 2.5% depending on the Nejayote type, which was possibly due to the retention of calcium ions in the colloidal mass (e.g., bio-flocculants) that formed on the surface of the membrane ( Gul et al, 2021 ). During the UF100 and UF1 steps, a reduction in pH was noted between 0.8 and 4.4% and between 2.7 and 12.5%, respectively, which could be ascribed to the selectivity of the membrane.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the pH generated by the addition of calcium hydroxide during the nixtamalization process resulted in a high alkalinity (>12), the pH values progressively decreased compared to the initial extract. In the MF process, the pH decreased between 0.7 and 2.5% depending on the Nejayote type, which was possibly due to the retention of calcium ions in the colloidal mass (e.g., bio-flocculants) that formed on the surface of the membrane ( Gul et al, 2021 ). During the UF100 and UF1 steps, a reduction in pH was noted between 0.8 and 4.4% and between 2.7 and 12.5%, respectively, which could be ascribed to the selectivity of the membrane.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are so many membrane cleaning methods reported in the literature: pneumatic cleaning [ 55 , 56 ], ultrasonic cleaning [ 57 , 58 ], sponge ball cleaning [ 59 , 60 ], and chemical cleaning [ 61 , 62 ] However, backflushing is the most accessible and cheaper technique to obtain maximum recovery among all. Anyhow, the effect of membrane cleaning methods on the NBR-GO membrane will be evaluated in the next study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By contrast, the reversible and irreversible fouling resistance after EC/O pretreatment had been significantly alleviated, which showed that pretreatment had a good control on membrane fouling caused by humic acid, especially the resistance to irreversible pollution on the membrane (Li et al 2019a(Li et al , 2019b. Since backwashing or other physical cleaning methods can easily reduce the reversible membrane fouling (Gul et al 2021), the pretreatment had important practical significance in the application of ultrafiltration.…”
Section: The Influence Of Ec/o Pretreatment On the Resistance Distribution Of Membrane Foulingmentioning
confidence: 99%