Foreign Aid Policy and Sources of Poverty: A Quantitative Framework

Abstract

The econometric literature has been unable to establish a robust association between foreign aid and growth and poverty reduction. In this paper, we argue that aid effectiveness must be assessed using methods that go beyond cross-country regressions. We calibrate a dynamic general equilibrium model that is capable of generating large sustained income gaps between rich and poor countries. The model quantifies three sources of poverty: (1) lack of access to international capital, (2) low schooling and high fertility (a poverty trap), and (3) an antigrowth domestic fiscal policy set by an elite. We analyze policies designed to address each source of poverty and compare the aid cost of their implementation. The policies differ dramatically in the extent and timing of their growth effects, and in the aid cost of their implementation. IMF Staff Papers (2007) 54, 59–90. doi:10.1057/palgrave.imfsp.9450005

The Culture of Corruption, Tax Evasion, and Economic Growth

“…For parameters other than φ, we use the calibration from the no-corruption Schneider (2012) estimates that the shadow economy is 26%-29% of GDP for 116 developing economies and 33%-38% for 25 transition economies. Net tax rates of this magnitude are common in developing countries (Mourmouras and Rangazas 2007). Once the model is calibrated, we attempt to find the optimal tax rate by first substituting Equations (15) and (16) into Equation (17), and then by searching over a range of tax rates to find the one that maximizes Equation (17).…”

Wage Gaps and Development: Lessons From U.S. History

“…This section extends the neoclassical growth model of Mourmouras and Rangazas (2007) to a two sector setting, with rural agriculture and urban industry. The analysis is conducted under two different assumptions about the way agricultural land is passed on from one generation to the next.…”

“…As in Mourmouras and Rangazas (2007), we set the schooling level of young children, s , to be 0.08. We know from Lord and Rangazas (2006) and t s % (schooling in 1780, which determine the initial human capital stocks for parents in 1800) and the fraction of rural households that migrant to industry in 1800, were then set to match seven targets.…”

Wage Gaps and Development: Lessons from US History

“…As in Mourmouras and Rangazas (2007), we set the schooling level of young children, s , to be 0.08. We know from Lord and Rangazas (2006) that time spent in school was in the range 0.08 to 0.10 during the second half of the 19 th century, and increased only modestly before then.…”