2009
DOI: 10.1175/2008waf2222152.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forecasting Lightning Threat Using Cloud-Resolving Model Simulations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
195
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 179 publications
(214 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
9
195
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These three lightning threat indexes are the graupel flux on the −15 • C isothermal plane, the integration of ice particles in the vertical direction and the weight sum of the formal two indexes (the weights are 0.95 and 0.05), respectively [32]. The lightning threat indexes are respectively named LTI01, LTI02 and LTI03.…”
Section: Some Diagnosed Methods Of Lightning and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These three lightning threat indexes are the graupel flux on the −15 • C isothermal plane, the integration of ice particles in the vertical direction and the weight sum of the formal two indexes (the weights are 0.95 and 0.05), respectively [32]. The lightning threat indexes are respectively named LTI01, LTI02 and LTI03.…”
Section: Some Diagnosed Methods Of Lightning and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, a radar data assimilation experiment was also conducted as a contrastive experiment. Moreover, the diagnosis basing on reflectivity and temperature and three kinds of lightning threat scores [32] in the National Severe Storms Laboratory (NSSL) are utilized to provide an equitable evaluation of the subsequent lightning forecast.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GLM proxy dataset accomplishes this by using flash statistics collected from the space-borne Lightning Imager Sensor (LIS) onboard the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM; Kummerow et al 1998) and the NALMA (Bateman et al 2008). Like the GLM, the LIS records optical events that are grouped into flashes (Mach et al 2007), whereas the LMA detects VHF electromagnetic radiation sources that are combined into flashes using a separate clustering algorithm (McCaul et al 2009). An example of a visual comparison for a flash between the LIS and LMA is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) and these locations are termed VHF source points. VHF source points are then combined using spatial criteria of 0.5 radians and a time criteria of 0.3s to identify VHF source points associated with a single flash (McCaul et al 2009). All VHF source points that meet these criteria are grouped into a single flash and a minimum of 10 VHF source points must be associated with a lightning flash for this analysis.…”
Section: B the North Alabama Lightning Mapping Arraymentioning
confidence: 99%