“…In such ambiguous situations, organizations are inclined to exercise some level of strategic choice, because more than one course of action may be considered 'appropriate'. In this way the taken-for-granted character of institutional mandates is challenged, as it makes actors aware of alternative courses of actions (Clemens & Cook, 1999;Dorado, 2005;Friedland & Alford, 1991;Greenwood, Raynard, Kodeih, Micelotta, & Lounsbury, 2011;Lepoutre & Valente, 2012;Oliver, 1991;Pache & Santos, 2010;Seo & Creed, 2002). However, one could ask whether there are specific institutional requirements that constrain the set of strategic responses as identified by Oliver (1991).…”