2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ocl.2008.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Focal Anatomic Patellofemoral Inlay Resurfacing: Theoretic Basis, Surgical Technique, and Case Reports

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
25
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…54,95,180,404,437 Th is prospective study describes the results of a metal implant designed for the talus. Th e presented outcomes show that patients generally benefi t from the procedure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…54,95,180,404,437 Th is prospective study describes the results of a metal implant designed for the talus. Th e presented outcomes show that patients generally benefi t from the procedure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…411 Promising short-term clinical results have been reported of other designs of the implant for the treatment of various human joints. 95,180,404,437 Two biomechanical cadaveric studies provided foundations for use of the talus implant in the ankle joint. 17,411 These studies showed that recessing the implant slightly relative to the adjacent cartilage level leads to acceptable contact stresses in the talocrural joint and is beneficial compared to leaving it proud.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Focal resurfacing with use of a metallic cap has been shown to be a promising alternative approach with which to avoid or delay joint replacement in middle-aged and older patients [14][15][16][17][18][19] . However, recent animal studies have suggested that articular damage can be associated with these implants [20][21][22] , especially in the case of surface-proud implantation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While requiring further analysis, this paradigmatic result can arise questions about the reliability of traditional severity classification, based on 2D morphological signs measured on X-ray images, indicating both uncertainty in the grade definition and difficulty to manually discriminate the grades, although performed by radiologic experts, as already extensively reported in the literature. [31] …”
Section: Final Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%