2007
DOI: 10.1080/02699200701502161
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fluency variation in adolescents

Abstract: The Speech Fluency Profile of fluent adolescent speakers of Brazilian Portuguese, were examined with respect to gender and neurolinguistic variations. Speech samples of 130 male and female adolescents, aged between 12;0 and 17;11 years were gathered. They were analysed according to type of speech disruption; speech rate; and frequency of speech disruptions. Statistical analysis did not find significant differences between genders for the variables studied. However, regarding the phases of adolescence (early: 1… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(44 reference statements)
0
2
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A participant was selected for groups CWS, TWS and AWS based on all of the following inclusion criteria: (a) present fluency profile outside the age reference values (Andrade 2004(Andrade , 2006Andrade & Martins, 2007), based on the analysis of 200 fluent syllables gathered from spontaneous speech, (b) receive a score of 12 points or more on the Stuttering Severity Instrument-3 (SSI-3) (Riley, 1994), (c) present over 3% stuttering-SLD per 100 syllables (Yairi & Ambrose, 2005).…”
Section: Inclusion Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A participant was selected for groups CWS, TWS and AWS based on all of the following inclusion criteria: (a) present fluency profile outside the age reference values (Andrade 2004(Andrade , 2006Andrade & Martins, 2007), based on the analysis of 200 fluent syllables gathered from spontaneous speech, (b) receive a score of 12 points or more on the Stuttering Severity Instrument-3 (SSI-3) (Riley, 1994), (c) present over 3% stuttering-SLD per 100 syllables (Yairi & Ambrose, 2005).…”
Section: Inclusion Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on factor analysis, proposed that interruptions and revisions serve as language formulation tools, filled pauses as message planning tools, and word and phrase repetitions as tools for maintaining fluency. Fluency skills vary between speakers, and disfluency frequency depends on several factors, like the speaker's age and sex, speech task, topic, and language (e.g., De Andrade & De Oliveira Martins, 2007Beke et al, 2014;Shriberg, 2005). In typical Englishspeaking populations, disfluency frequency -the proposition of disfluent syllables in all syllables -has been approximately 6% with a wide variation (Fox Tree, 1995;Roberts et al, 2009).…”
Section: Typical Disfluencies In Adultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Egy másik taxonómia a beszéd hibajelenségei (speech errors) közé sorolja a nyelvbotlásokat, a hezitációkat, téves kezdéseket, félreartikulálásokat, változtatásokat, megszakításokat és ismétléseket (Shattuck−Hufnagel 1979). Olyan kutatásokkal is találkozhatunk, ahol az el bbi két kategória mellett az önjavítások (self-repairs) kategóriája is megjelenik (Postma et al 1990), az újabb rendszerezések pedig megkülönböztetik a néma és kitöltött szüneteket, a töltelékszavakat és hezitálásokat, az ismétléseket (egy vagy több szó esetében), a befejezetlen közléseket, az újraindításokat és a nyújtásokat (Searl−Gabel−Fulks 2002, Carlo−Waston 2003, Yairi−Ambrose 2005, De Andrade−de Oliveira Martins 2007, Roberts et al 2009.…”
Section: Meghatározás éS Tipológiaunclassified