IEEE InternationalElectron Devices Meeting, 2005. IEDM Technical Digest.
DOI: 10.1109/iedm.2005.1609437
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fluctuation limits & amp; scaling opportunities for CMOS SRAM cells

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
89
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 141 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
89
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If V write is larger than V trip of {T 3,T 5} inverter, the write will fail. Since T 2 and T 6 (also T 1 and T 5) are typically the smallest transistors in the cell, V th variations in these transistors causes large variation in V write , resulting in a high probability of write failure [6].…”
Section: Soft Error Tolerance In Sramsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If V write is larger than V trip of {T 3,T 5} inverter, the write will fail. Since T 2 and T 6 (also T 1 and T 5) are typically the smallest transistors in the cell, V th variations in these transistors causes large variation in V write , resulting in a high probability of write failure [6].…”
Section: Soft Error Tolerance In Sramsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect is pronounced in SRAMs where minimum-geometry transistors are used. The number of variation-induced defective memory cells becomes high with device scaling [6] [2], leading the conventional redundancy techniques (e.g., using redundancy rows/columns) to become impractical. Combination of a redundancy technique with ECC can tolerate a high degree of random defects [13] [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, methods have been developed to characterize SRAM variability by measuring DC read/write/retention margins in small SRAM macros with wired-out storage nodes. In these macros SRAM is commonly characterized by measuring the I-V characteristics of its constituent transistors or by characterizing the static read stability or static writeability of the SRAM cells [35]. This method requires the insertion of large switch networks to access all internal storage nodes without changing the lithographic environment of the cells, Figure 6.…”
Section: Sram Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Write margin can also be measured as the writeability current (I W , as defined in Fig. 4c and [4]), or the write noise margin derived from the butterfly curves (BFC) [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Write margin can also be measured as the writeability current (I W , as defined in Fig. 4c and [4]), or the write noise margin derived from the butterfly curves (BFC) [1].Read Stability: The read stability of an SRAM cell is conventionally quantified by the cell read static noise margin (RSNM) [5] and is highly sensitive to the cell supply. To characterize the read stability of an SRAM cell in a large array, BL current at the '0' storage node (I MEAS1 ) is monitored while ramping down the cell supply with the bit-lines pre-charged and WL driven by the nominal supply.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%