2017
DOI: 10.3133/sir20165140
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flood-frequency characteristics of Wisconsin streams

Abstract: For more information on the USGS-the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment-visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1-888-ASK-USGS.For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://store.usgs.gov/.Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.Although this information product, for the most part, is in the publ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(16 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study area was previously represented by three hydrologic regions ( fig. 2) developed using a combination of statistical analyses from previous studies (Eash and others, 2013;Lorenz and others, 2010;Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, 2013;Sando and others, 2008;Walker and Krug, 2003;Williams-Sether, 2015). Streamgages included in this study were assigned a map number, and information associated with each map number (streamgage) can be found in table 1 (available for download at https://doi.…”
Section: Description Of Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The study area was previously represented by three hydrologic regions ( fig. 2) developed using a combination of statistical analyses from previous studies (Eash and others, 2013;Lorenz and others, 2010;Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, 2013;Sando and others, 2008;Walker and Krug, 2003;Williams-Sether, 2015). Streamgages included in this study were assigned a map number, and information associated with each map number (streamgage) can be found in table 1 (available for download at https://doi.…”
Section: Description Of Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Explanatory variables such as base flow index, drainage area, main-channel slope, lake area, shapefactor (calculated as a ratio of basin length squared divided by drainage area), mean annual precipitation, storage area (area of lakes and wetlands), and mean annual runoff were used for regional regression analysis. The hydrologic region for the Province of Ontario (Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, 2013) and neighboring U.S. States of Iowa (Eash and others, 2013), Minnesota (Lorenz and others, 2010), North Dakota (Williams-Sether, 2015), South Dakota (Sando and others, 2008) and Wisconsin (Walker and Krug, 2003) are shown in figure 2. The six peak-flow region GIS datasets were assembled, one for each of the five States and one Canadian Province, and were harmonized by color along State and Provincial boundaries.…”
Section: Definition Of Peak-flow Hydrologic Regionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The list of streamgages with at least 10 years of record in the study area was screened to eliminate those with potential measurement accuracy issues using several criteria. One was to refer to the list of streamgages used in the most recent published rural flood-frequency studies (Soong and others [2004] in Illinois, Rao [2006] in Indiana, and Walker and Krug [2003] in Wisconsin). John Walker (USGS, written commun., 2013) also provided a list of streamgages being used in an ongoing flood-frequency study in Wisconsin.…”
Section: Streamgage Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The largest increase was 9 percent for the Kickapoo River at Steuben. It should be noted that while low-flow characteristics have not been updated in a USGS report since the 1970s and 1980s, the peak discharges determined by Conger (1981) were updated periodically in subsequent reports by Krug and others (1992) and Walker and Krug (2003). Table 6 lists the average annual precipitation for the 15 streamflow-gaging station watersheds for the periods 1915-68 and 1969-2008 along with percent change between the 2 periods.…”
Section: Streamflow Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%