1988
DOI: 10.1002/bimj.4710300308
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fleiss, J. L.: The Design and Analysis of Clinical Experiments. Wiley, New York – Chichester – Brislane – Toronto – Singapore 1986, 432 S., £38.35

Abstract: Chiohester -Brislane -Toronto-Singapore 1986,432 s., E 38.35.Die Durchfiihrung geplanter biomedizinischer Versuche und Studien rnit Probanden hat im letzten Jahnehnt einen betriichtlichen Aufschwung genommen. Daa vorliegende Buch befaUt sich spe-

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Third, reliability was assessed within trials for each rider by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). According to these analyses, ICCs values were considered as poor (ICCs < 0.40), fair (ICCs = 0.40-0.59), good (ICCs = 0.60-0.74), and excellent (ICCs ≥ 0.75) [24,25]. Reliability coefficients > 0.90 were adequate for clinical measurements as proposed by Portney and Watkins [26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, reliability was assessed within trials for each rider by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). According to these analyses, ICCs values were considered as poor (ICCs < 0.40), fair (ICCs = 0.40-0.59), good (ICCs = 0.60-0.74), and excellent (ICCs ≥ 0.75) [24,25]. Reliability coefficients > 0.90 were adequate for clinical measurements as proposed by Portney and Watkins [26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intra-and inter-rater reliability was established for the ILP scores and its components by the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) with a 95% confidence interval 18 and for the classifications of ILP scores and its components by the quadratic weighted Kappa Coefficient 19 associated with the percent agreement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ICC values were categorized as poor (<0.40), moderate (0.40≤ICC≤0.75) or excellent (>0.75) 18 . Kappa values were categorized as poor agreement (K<0), slight agreement (0.01-0.20), fair agreement (0.21-0.40), moderate agreement (0.41-0.60), substantial agreement (0.61-0.80), almost perfect agreement (0.81-0.99), perfect agreement (k=1) 19 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations