Flavonoidglycoside ausArnica montanaundArnica chamissonis1

Merfort, Irmgard; Wendisch, Detlef

doi:10.1055/s-2006-962766

Cited by 61 publications

(41 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Acetates are common, but other aliphatic acids are encountered, malonic and succinic for example. Singly acetylated flavone or flavonol glycosides have been reported from Arnica (Merfort, 1986(Merfort, , 1988aMerfort and Wendisch, 1987), Chrysactinia (Harborne et aI., 1991), Chrysanthemum (Hu et aI., 1994), Doronicum (Reynaud et aI., 1985;Reynaud and Raynaud, 1986), Helenium and Plummera (Wagner et aI., 197Ic), Hymenoxys (Wagner et aI., 1972h), Matricaria (Kunde andIsaac, 1979; Redaelli et aI., 1980; Pietta et aI., 1987) and Senecio (Piegay et aI., 1986). Chalcones and aurones have also been found to occur as acetylated glycosides in a few species.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Flavonoids of the Sunflower Family (Asteraceae)

Bohm

Stuessy

2001

119

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically those of translation, reprinting, re-use of illustrations, broadcasting, reproduction by photocopying machines or similar means, and storage in data banks. This book is dedicated to:Arthur Cronquist Outstanding plant systematist and major contributor to understanding taxonomic relationships within Asteraceae and Ralph E. Alston (1925Alston ( -1967) Visionary natural products chemist and geneticist who pioneered the use of chemical data in studies of plant systematics and evolution PrefaceCertainly many of the readers of this book will remember the early developments of chemosystematics in the late 1950s. We ourselves remember the excitement of these new data bearing on plant interrelationships. The hopes were high, the techniques were rapidly evolving, the quantities of data were large, and young workers were eagerly enthusiastic. Some even went so far as to predict that chemical data would soon replace morphological information as the basis for plant classification. These overly zealous predictions did not materialize, of course, as the history of plant systematics has amply shown during the past two centuries. If there is any distinct characteristic of systematics it is synthesis, as Lincoln Constance (1964) called it, the "unending synthesis." New tools generate new data and provide insights on additional dimensions of plant relationships. This will never change-we will continue to discover new tools and new data in the years ahead, and they will continue to be incorporated into the predictive general reference system of classification.The earlier efforts in chemosystematics focused on secondary plant products: alkaloids, betacyanins, carbohydrates, cyanogenic glycosides, glucosinolates, lipids, terpenoids, and especialiy flavonoids. The latter were particularly well suited for chemosystematic investigation for several reasons: ease of isolation and characterization, small amounts of plant material needed for analysis, stability of compounds especially through routine preparation of herbarium specimens, and low cost to obtain useful information. As a result of these considerable advantages, literally thousands of studies on use of flavonoids in plant systematics have been published. Although now with the present zest for macromolecular data from DNA restriction sites and sequences, there are fewer workers and laboratories dedicated to flavonoid chemosystematic studies; twenty years ago they were the new currency of exciting data in plant systematics.Because of many workers historically interested in the sunflower family, Asteraceae (or Compositae), in part due to its large size (approximately 23,000 species;Bremer, 1994), and because hundreds of flavonoid compounds were discovered in this family, many chemosystematic investigations have been completed on various taxa. Many studies came from the laboratories of R. A. Alston, B. L. Turner, and T. J. Mabry in the Department of Botany ...

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Flavonoids of the Sunflower Family (Asteraceae)

Bohm

Stuessy

2001

119

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…(Lyss et al, 1997, Wagner et al, 2004Merfort, 2003;Wagner i Merfort, 2007). Pored sekviterpenskih laktona najviše izučavana jedinjenja u cvetu arnike su svakako flavonoidi u formama flavonoidnih glikozida (Merfort i Wendisch 1987, flavonoidnih glukunorida (Merfort i Wendisch 1988) i flavonoidnih aglikona (Merfort i Wendisch 1985). Ostale prateće supstance u cvetu arnike su karotenoidi (Vanhaelen, 1973), diterpeni (Schmidt et al, 1992); arnidiol (triterpen) (Santer i Stevenson, 1962), pirolizidinski alkaloidi (tusilagin i izotusilagin) , poliacetileni (Schulte et al, 1969), kumarini (umbeliferon i skopoletin) (Willuhn, 1989), fenolne kiseline (holorogenska kiselina, kafena kiselina i cinarin) (Merfort, 1992;Ebert et al, 1988;Kohlmünzer 2000;Reyes-Salas et al 2002), lignani (Schmidt et al 2006) and oligosaharidi (White et al, 1985;Kennedy et al, 1988).…”

Section: Hemijska Identifikacijaunclassified

“…Fenolna jedinjenja su identifikovana poređenjem sa autentičnim referentnim jedinjenjima izolovanim iz arnike u prehodnim studijama (Merfort, 1984;Merfort i Wendisch, 1987;Spitaler et al, 2006) (Tabela 28). Od identifikovanih jedinjenja za određivanje sadržaja odabrana je jedna fenolna kiselina (hlorogenska kiselina) i dva dominantna flavonoida (kvercetin-3-O-glukozid i kempferol-3-O-glukozid).…”

Section: Sadržaj Dominantnih Fenolnih Komponentiunclassified

Influence of growing conditions on morphological and chemical properties and biological effects of extracts of Arnica montana L.

Pljevljakušić¹

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Belgrade, 2012(1,7 -2,4%).Mikroskopskim snimanjem samlevenog biljnog materijala pod različitim uveličanjima ustanovljena je jednostavna procedura identifikacije cveta arnike u odnosu na dva pretpostavljena falsifikata. Tako Since the A. montana plant specie is not native to the region of Serbia, although it occurs spontaneously in some mountain areas of neighboring countries and the Balkans in general, the aim of this study was to find a suitable technology solution of field cultivation based on the examination of induced various ecological factor effects.In this research, beside observations connected with flower heads, as the main drug, underground parts of arnica: rhizome and roots, were also studied as side products. The first phase of the experimental work included a three-year three-factorial field experiment in different modes of production, where as the factors examined: time of plantation establishment (spring and autumn planting), fertilization (manure and NPK) and methods of propagation (from seed and clonal propagation -division of the tuft). In the second phase of the experiment, characterization of the raw material was carried out in the terms of its rapid identification, qualitative evaluations based on the content of secondary metabolites and testing of biological effects of extracts obtained.Tests were performed on the field experiment conducted in 2008 at locality of Kaludjerske Bare (1008 m) on mountain Tara, in area of Nursery production department of the National Park "Tara". Since arnica its first vegetation remains in the rosette phenophase, all measurements of morphological parameters, yields and chemical Summary Doctoral Dissertation

show abstract

“…Its other constituents are triterpene arnidiol, flavonoids, coumarins, tannins, pyrrolizidine alkaloids, essential oil, etc (ESCOP 2000, Kos et al 2005, Merfort 1992, Merfort and Wendisch 1987, Murav'eva, Samylina, and Yakovlev 2002, Yakovlev and Blinova 1999, 2004. The dried rhizome and roots of mountain arnica are also used, although seldom; their constituents are similar to those of the flowers (Evans 2000).…”

Section: Arnica Montanamentioning

confidence: 99%

How the Name Arnica Was Borrowed Into Estonian

Sõukand¹,

Raal²

2008

Trames

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. The name of the classical medicinal plant, mountain arnica (Arnica montana), was well known among Estonians at the end of the 19th century, although mountain arnica itself does not grow in Estonia. The folklore collection of the Estonian Folklore Archives indicates that the name was used to denote locally growing plants. The impulse for such renaming of local plants obviously came from popular medical books and almanacs published in Estonian in the 18th-19th centuries. The article discusses a particular example, arguing that foreign names were probably given to folk medicinal plants that were already effectively used. Many of them, however, had not received attention so far by pharmacological research.

show abstract

Flavonoidglycoside ausArnica montanaundArnica chamissonis¹

Cited by 61 publications

References 4 publications

Flavonoids of the Sunflower Family (Asteraceae)

Flavonoids of the Sunflower Family (Asteraceae)

Influence of growing conditions on morphological and chemical properties and biological effects of extracts of Arnica montana L.

How the Name Arnica Was Borrowed Into Estonian

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About