This review encompasses the most important advances in liver functions and hepatotoxicity and analyzes which mechanisms can be studied in vitro. In a complex architecture of nested, zonated lobules, the liver consists of approximately 80 % hepatocytes and 20 % non-parenchymal cells, the latter being involved in a secondary phase that may dramatically aggravate the initial damage. Hepatotoxicity, as well as hepatic metabolism, is controlled by a set of nuclear receptors (including PXR, CAR, HNF-4α, FXR, LXR, SHP, VDR and PPAR) and signaling pathways. When isolating liver cells, some pathways are activated, e.g., the RAS/MEK/ERK pathway, whereas others are silenced (e.g. HNF-4α), resulting in up- and downregulation of hundreds of genes. An understanding of these changes is crucial for a correct interpretation of in vitro data. The possibilities and limitations of the most useful liver in vitro systems are summarized, including three-dimensional culture techniques, co-cultures with non-parenchymal cells, hepatospheres, precision cut liver slices and the isolated perfused liver. Also discussed is how closely hepatoma, stem cell and iPS cell–derived hepatocyte-like-cells resemble real hepatocytes. Finally, a summary is given of the state of the art of liver in vitro and mathematical modeling systems that are currently used in the pharmaceutical industry with an emphasis on drug metabolism, prediction of clearance, drug interaction, transporter studies and hepatotoxicity. One key message is that despite our enthusiasm for in vitro systems, we must never lose sight of the in vivo situation. Although hepatocytes have been isolated for decades, the hunt for relevant alternative systems has only just begun.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00204-013-1078-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Sesquiterpene lactones (SLs) have potent antiinflammatory properties. We have shown previously that they exert this effect in part by inhibiting activation of the transcription factor NF-B, a central regulator of the immune response. We have proposed a molecular mechanism for this inhibition based on computer molecular modeling data. In this model, SLs directly alkylate the p65 subunit of NF-B, thereby inhibiting DNA binding. Nevertheless, an experimental evidence for the proposed mechanism was lacking. Moreover, based on experiments using the SL parthenolide, an alternative mode of action has been proposed by other authors in which SLs inhibit IB-␣ degradation. Here we report the construction of p65/ NF-B point mutants that lack the cysteine residues alkylated by SLs in our model. In contrast to wild type p65, DNA-binding of the Cys 38 3 Ser and Cys 38,120 3 Ser mutants is no longer inhibited by SLs. In addition, we provide evidence that parthenolide uses a similar mechanism to other SLs in inhibiting NF-B. Contrary to previous reports, we show that parthenolide, like other SLs, inhibits NF-B most probably by alkylating p65 at Cys 38 . Although a slight inhibition of IB degradation was detected for all SLs, the amount of remaining IB was too low to explain the observed NF-B inhibition.The transcription factor NF-B promotes the expression of over 150 target genes in response to inflammation, viral and bacterial infections, and other stressful situations (1, 2). Both the nature of the NF-B inducers and the function of its target genes highlight its role, as a central mediator of the human immune response.NF-B is most frequently composed of a p50 and a p65 subunit retained in the cytoplasm in an inactive form by binding to IB, an inhibitory subunit. Inducers of NF-B, such as bacterial lipopolysaccharides (LPS) 1 or inflammatory cytokines, activate the IB kinase complex (IKC), which phosphorylates IB on serines 32 and 36. Phosphorylation causes IB ubiquitinylation and its subsequent degradation by the 26-S proteasome. Degradation of the inhibitor allows NF-B to translocate to the nucleus, where it stimulates transcription of its target genes.2 Genes that are regulated by NF-B include, for example, proinflammatory and inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin-1, -2, -4, and -6 or TNF-␣, as well as genes encoding immunoreceptors, cell adhesion molecules, acute phase proteins, and enzymes such as cyclooxygenase-II. Because of its central role in regulating inflammatory responses, a pharmacological inhibition of NF-B activation could be beneficial in the treatment of inflammation (4). Using helenalin as a model, we have shown that SLs inhibit neither IB degradation nor NF-B nuclear translocation. SLs interact directly with NF-B. DNA binding of NF-B is prevented by selectively alkylating cysteine sulfhydryl groups in its p65 subunit (5, 6). There are strong indications that this is a general mechanism for SLs, which possess ␣,␤-or ␣,␤,␥-unsaturated carbonyl structures such as ␣-methylene-␥-lactones or ␣,␤-unsubstituted...

Luteolin is a flavone which occurs in medicinal plants as well as in some vegetables and spices. It is a natural anti-oxidant with less pro-oxidant potential than the flavonol quercetin, the best studied flavonoid, but apparently with a better safety profile. It displays excellent radical scavenging and cytoprotective properties, especially when tested in complex biological systems where it can interact with other anti-oxidants like vitamins. Luteolin displays specific anti-inflammatory effects at micromolar concentrations which are only partly explained by its anti-oxidant capacities. The anti-inflammatory activity includes activation of anti-oxidative enzymes, suppression of the NFkappaB pathway and inhibition of pro-inflammatory substances. In vivo, luteolin reduced increased vascular permeability and was effective in animal models of inflammation after parenteral and oral application. Although luteolin is only a minor component in our nutrition (less than 1 mg/day) epidemiological studies indicate that it has the potential to protect from diseases associated with inflammatory processes such as cardiovascular disease. Luteolin often occurs in the form of glycosides in plants, but these are cleaved and the aglycones are conjugated and metabolized after nutritional uptake which has to be considered when evaluating in vitro studies. Some data for oral and topical bioavailability exist, but more quantitative research in this field is needed to evaluate the physiological and therapeutical potential of luteolin.

Luteolin is a flavonoid which is part of our daily nutrition in relatively low amounts (less than 1 mg/day). Nevertheless, some epidemiological studies suggest an inverse correlation between luteolin intake and the risk of some cancer types. Luteolin displays specific anti-inflammatory and anti-carcinogenic effects, which can only partly be explained by its anti-oxidant and free radical scavenging capacities. Luteolin can delay or block the development of cancer cells in vitro and in vivo by protection from carcinogenic stimuli, by inhibition of tumor cell proliferation, by induction of cell cycle arrest and by induction of apoptosis via intrinsic and extrinsic signaling pathways. When compared to other flavonoids, luteolin was usually among the most effective ones, inhibiting tumor cell proliferation with IC50 values between 3 and 50 µM in vitro and in vivo by 5 to 10 mg/kg i.p., intragastric application of 0.1–0.3 mg/kg/d, or as food additive in concentrations of 50 to 200 ppm. Luteolin has been shown to penetrate into human skin, making it also a candidate for the prevention and treatment of skin cancer.

No abstract