2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1314.2005.00584.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Five generations of monazite in Langtang gneisses: implications for chronology of the Himalayan metamorphic core

Abstract: Monazite grains from Greater Himalayan Sequence gneisses, Langtang valley, Nepal, were chemically mapped and then dated in situ via Th-Pb ion-microprobe analysis. Correlation of ages and chemistry reveals at least five different generations of monazite, ranging from c. 9 to >300 Ma. Petrological models of monazite chemistry provide a link between these generations and the thermal evolution of these rocks, yielding an age for the melting of Greater Himalayan rocks within the Main Central Thrust sheet (c. 16 Ma)… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
242
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 239 publications
(258 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
14
242
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This mineral may grow directly from the melt, or form due to final melt crystallization (see also Högdahl et al 2012). Notwithstanding this problem, a general trend of increasing Y content from initial melting up to melt crystallization has been observed (Kohn et al 2005). Given this, the youngest monazite should be the richest in Y, which is a consequence of garnet consumption during melting or postcrystallization retrogression during cooling.…”
Section: Y-th-u Systematics and Monazite Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This mineral may grow directly from the melt, or form due to final melt crystallization (see also Högdahl et al 2012). Notwithstanding this problem, a general trend of increasing Y content from initial melting up to melt crystallization has been observed (Kohn et al 2005). Given this, the youngest monazite should be the richest in Y, which is a consequence of garnet consumption during melting or postcrystallization retrogression during cooling.…”
Section: Y-th-u Systematics and Monazite Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The typically negligible amount of common Pb in the monazite lattice provides a unique opportunity for non-isotopic chemical electron microprobe (EPMA) dating (e.g., Suzuki and Adachi 1991;Montel et al 1996;Williams et al 2006;Suzuki and Kato 2008;Spear et al 2009). This feature of monazite is, in many cases, the greatest advantage, because the very high spatial resolution of the EMPA allows the dating of fine-scale compositional domains (e.g., Terry et al 2000;Dahl et al 2005;Kohn et al 2005;Pyle et al 2005;Mahan et al 2006;Krenn et al 2009;Petrík and Konečný 2009). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The debris-covered surface of Lirung Glacier is spatially heterogeneous and within the thermal survey area there are large boulders, gravel, sand, patches with dry shrubs, supraglacial ponds, and ice cliffs. The geology and consequently the supraglacial debris in this part of the valley largely consists of gneiss and quartzite (Kohn et al, 2005). Since all these surfaces have different emissivities, spatially distributed emissivity data is required to derive an accurate surface temperature.…”
Section: Object-based Emissivity Correctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the fact that monazite contains negligible amounts of common Pb relative to radiogenic Pb (Parrish 1990), it is possible to use the chemical Th-U-total Pb method employing an electron microprobe to constrain its age (Jercinovic and Williams 2005;Jercinovic et al 2008;Konečný 2004;Montel et al 1996;Pyle et al 2005;Spear et al 2009;Adachi 1991, 1994;Suzuki and Kato 2008). Although chemical dating of monazite is mostly used in metamorphic petrology (Finger and Krenn 2007;Kohn et al 2005;Liu et al 2007;Rosa-Costa et al 2008;Tickyj et al 2004;Williams et al 2007), it has also found applications in constraining the ages of magmatic events with high precision (Just et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%