1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0305-750x(98)00116-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fiscal decentralization in Indonesia: A comment on smoke and lewis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
5
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…25, passed in 1999 andimplemented in 2001. The enactment of these laws has changed Indonesia from a highly centralized state, with governance, planning, and fiscal management partially`deconcentrated' to provincial government offices, to a decentralized state with power over these responsibilities`devolved' to lower levels of government (Alm et al, 2001;Beier and Ferrazzi, 1998;Booth, 2003;Smoke and Lewis, 1996). From a policy perspective, successful decentralization rests on the assumption that citizens through their participation in civil society organizations will undertake many planning and service-delivery functions previously the responsibility of various levels of government.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25, passed in 1999 andimplemented in 2001. The enactment of these laws has changed Indonesia from a highly centralized state, with governance, planning, and fiscal management partially`deconcentrated' to provincial government offices, to a decentralized state with power over these responsibilities`devolved' to lower levels of government (Alm et al, 2001;Beier and Ferrazzi, 1998;Booth, 2003;Smoke and Lewis, 1996). From a policy perspective, successful decentralization rests on the assumption that citizens through their participation in civil society organizations will undertake many planning and service-delivery functions previously the responsibility of various levels of government.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sebaliknya, desentralisasi dan otonomi daerah justru membuat praktik penyelenggaraan pemerintahan di daerah menjadi lebih rumit. Desentralisasi dan otonomi daerah menciptakan kekuatan politik lokal yang baru, membuat relasi daerah menjadi lebih kompleks dan pada konteks tertentu melahirkan sejumlah praktik tata kelola pemerintahan yang kurang efisien (Beier & Ferrazzi, 1998;Carnegie, 2008;Ferrazzi, 2000;Hadiz, 2004;Ito, 2006).…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified
“…Pemekaran yang secara normatif di maksudkan untuk mempermudah layanan sosial serta meningkatkan penyelenggaraan pemerintahan, harus kandas. Penyebabnya, desentralisasi membuat konflik antara elit lokal semakin kompleks (Beier & Ferrazzi, 1998;Comola & Mello, 2010;Hadiz, 2004). Terutama untuk konflik yang berlangsung dalam arena elektoral (Ito, 2006(Ito, , 2011.…”
Section: Kesimpulanunclassified
“…Sidik (2000) describes the same thing, that decentralization is an instrument to achieve one of the goals of the state. Beier & Ferrazzi (1998) explain that regional autonomy is generally followed by fiscal decentralization policy, as an instrument in support of local public services with the transfer of funds to the regions. Decentralization is more likely to aspects of state administration (administration aspect) (Stewart, 1988;Pidie, 1997).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%