Proceedings of the Third Annual Workshop on Lifelog Search Challenge 2020
DOI: 10.1145/3379172.3391726
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FIRST - Flexible Interactive Retrieval SysTem for Visual Lifelog Exploration at LSC 2020

Abstract: Lifelog can provide useful insights of our daily activities. It is essential to provide a flexible way for users to retrieve certain events or moments of interest, corresponding to a wide variation of query types. This motivates us to develop FIRST, a Flexible Interactive Retrieval SysTem, to help users to combine or integrate various query components in a flexible manner to handle different query scenarios, such as visual clustering data based on color histogram, visual similarity, GPS location, or scene attr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, this retrieval tool is a successful system for known-item and ad-hoc-search tasks. Both LifeSeeker 2.0 [18] and FIRST v1 [30] also support this approach. LifeSeeker 2.0 focuses on text query using a Bag-of-Words approach with visual concept augmentation [18], while our previous systems [16,30] exploit personalized concepts.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, this retrieval tool is a successful system for known-item and ad-hoc-search tasks. Both LifeSeeker 2.0 [18] and FIRST v1 [30] also support this approach. LifeSeeker 2.0 focuses on text query using a Bag-of-Words approach with visual concept augmentation [18], while our previous systems [16,30] exploit personalized concepts.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Figure 1 shows the overview structure of our proposed system. We use the user-interface and system integration platforms from our FIRST version 1 [30] to manage different layouts and user interaction modalities, and query processing components, respectively. We provide five main query processing components in our current system.…”
Section: Lifelog Event Retrieval With Flexible Components 31 System Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, all the above systems do not focus on the interaction between objects in the lifelog data or the query. Some systems did make progress by encoding the entire textual input or generating captions for lifelogging images to describe activities appearing in them [30,31]. However, these ideas did not focus on the association between objects in lifelog images.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another common approach is to transform images metadata and queries into the same space through an embedding algorithm to be able to make the comparison. This idea was adopted by almost the half of the participants in the LSC'20 [17,20,26,27,39]. On the other hand, SOMHunter [27] which was the runner-up system of the competition and Exquisitor [17] heavily relied on user's relevance feedback, while LifeGraph [33] explored the potential of indexing the lifelog into a graph structure [30].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%