Proceedings of the 4th Annual on Lifelog Search Challenge 2021
DOI: 10.1145/3463948.3469064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Myscéal 2.0: A Revised Experimental Interactive Lifelog Retrieval System for LSC'21

Abstract: Building an interactive retrieval system for lifelogging contains many challenges due to massive multi-modal personal data besides the requirement of accuracy and rapid response for such a tool. The Lifelog Search Challenge (LSC) is the international lifelog retrieval competition that inspires researchers to develop their systems to cope with the challenges and evaluates the effectiveness of their solutions. In this paper, we upgrade our previous Myscéal and present Myscéal 2.0 system for the LSC'21 with the i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most common approach to organizing, retrieving, and analyzing data from wearable cameras involves assigning semantic contexts to images, like visual descriptions, time, and location [ 13 , 14 ]. Various computer vision models are employed to extract visual information from the images, including object detection, activity recognition, optical character recognition [ 13 , 15 ], and embedding models [ 16 , 17 ]. A typical retrieval system would also incorporate different techniques, namely, query enhancement [ 13 ], visual similarity search [ 16 ], and temporal search [ 16 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The most common approach to organizing, retrieving, and analyzing data from wearable cameras involves assigning semantic contexts to images, like visual descriptions, time, and location [ 13 , 14 ]. Various computer vision models are employed to extract visual information from the images, including object detection, activity recognition, optical character recognition [ 13 , 15 ], and embedding models [ 16 , 17 ]. A typical retrieval system would also incorporate different techniques, namely, query enhancement [ 13 ], visual similarity search [ 16 ], and temporal search [ 16 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This involves assigning semantic contexts like visual descriptions, time, and location [ 13 , 14 ]. Various computer vision models are employed, such as object detection, activity recognition, and optical character recognition, in addition to embedding models [ 13 , 15 - 17 ]. Retrieval systems incorporate techniques such as query enhancement, visual similarity search, and temporal search [ 13 , 16 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 12 shows the time distribution for correct responses across all participating teams and evaluation topics. MySceal [53] has the best median time among the top 6 systems on the leaderboard while Memento [1] stands at 5th position in terms of median time of submission, better only to LifeSeeker's [44] tally. Figure 13 shows the count of occurences when the system was in top 3 to submit a correct response for a query.…”
Section: Analysis Of Topic 21mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different lifelog benchmarking workshops/challenges have been established with distinctive evaluation metrics to assess lifelog systems, with the common objective being to facilitate the effective retrieval of specific lifelog images in an interactive or automatic manner. The standard approach taken by existing lifelog retrieval systems, such as MyScéal [26] and LifeSeeker [20], is assigning semantic context, e.g., visual concepts, to lifelog photos and applying traditional information retrieval techniques to produce a ranked list of relevant images. This approach treats each lifelog photo individually, which does not exploit the temporal and continuous nature of lifelog data.…”
Section: Lifelogs and Personal Data Analyticsmentioning
confidence: 99%