2015
DOI: 10.1080/01490419.2015.1030052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First Calibration Results for the SARAL/AltiKa Altimetric Mission Using the Gavdos Permanent Facilities

Abstract: Downloaded by [University of California, San Diego] at 02:50 13 June 2015 ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 2 This work presents the first calibration results for the SARAL/AltiKa altimetric mission using the Gavdos permanent calibration facilities. The results are covering one year of altimetric observations from April, 2013 till March 2014, and include 11 calibration values for the altimeter bias. The reference ascending orbit No. 571 of SARAL/AltiKa has been used for this altimeter assessment. This sa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The same Cal/Val infrastructure has also been used for the calibration of the SARAL/AltiKa altimetric mission along its ascending Pass No. 571 [53] as well as for the Chinese mission HY-2A (descending Pass No. 280) [31].…”
Section: Sea-surface Calibration Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same Cal/Val infrastructure has also been used for the calibration of the SARAL/AltiKa altimetric mission along its ascending Pass No. 571 [53] as well as for the Chinese mission HY-2A (descending Pass No. 280) [31].…”
Section: Sea-surface Calibration Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[8], Kavaratti (Section 2.1.1), Corsica (Section 2.1.2, Lake Issykul (Section 2.1.3), the regional (Section 2.2) and global (Section 2.3) approaches. The mean value of all the determinations is −54 mm with a standard deviation of 15 mm.…”
Section: Quality Assessment Of Water Level Through Calibration and Vamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since Jason-2 reprocessing (GDR-D products) instrumental errors discovered by the project (» 15.6 cm on the range, see Bonnefond et al 2012 for details) have been applied leading to remove the SSH bias that is now close to 0 as assessed by OSTST (2013). Concerning the SARAL/AltiKa SSH bias, the origin is not currently known but other studies found similar values (¡5 cm) either from in situ (Babu et al 2015;Bonnefond et al 2015;Mertikas et al 2015) or global comparisons with Jason-2 (Prandi et al 2015;Desai and Haines 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%