2013
DOI: 10.1057/ces.2013.6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Firm-Level Determinants of Board System Choice: Evidence from Russia

Abstract: Abstract:In this paper, using a unique dataset of joint-stock companies, we empirically examine the determinants of the choice and size of the collective executive board, a core element of the multi-tier board system of Russian firms. Our empirical evidence strongly suggests that the need of company executives for a collective management system is a key driver for the formation of a collective executive board, while outside investors are generally indifferent toward its adoption as a means to strengthening the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the exception of 2014, the share of independent directors has risen each year, which is also a sign of the board's improved ability to supervise managers. The proportion of independent directors ranges between 25% and 32%, which is slightly lower than the data of [Iwasaki, 2008;2013;2014], and is consistent with figures from the survey of [Frye, Iwasaki, 2011]. The closest sample to the one used in the current paper is that of [Prokofieva, Muniandy, 2011], who report an average independence rate of 40%.…”
Section: Basic Statisticssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…With the exception of 2014, the share of independent directors has risen each year, which is also a sign of the board's improved ability to supervise managers. The proportion of independent directors ranges between 25% and 32%, which is slightly lower than the data of [Iwasaki, 2008;2013;2014], and is consistent with figures from the survey of [Frye, Iwasaki, 2011]. The closest sample to the one used in the current paper is that of [Prokofieva, Muniandy, 2011], who report an average independence rate of 40%.…”
Section: Basic Statisticssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…In particular, earlier studies tended to rely on original surveys using convenience and "quasi-random" samples that are unlikely to be representative of the population or important sub-populations of Russian firms (Basargin and Perevalov, 2000;Judge et al, 2003;Peng et al, 2003). 8 Several papers rely on the large-scale survey by Hitotsubashi University and the Higher School of Economics, which involved stratified sampling among industrial and communications enterprises with more than 100 employees from 64 regions (Iwasaki, 2008(Iwasaki, , 2013(Iwasaki, , 2014Frye and Iwasaki, 2011). More recent analyses tend to draw samples from the population of companies traded on the stock market (e.g.…”
Section: Review Of the Literature On Corporate Boards In Russiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 The single executive body refers to a top manager (CEO, President, or General Director), while the collective executive board consists of corporate officers and executes company management in cooperation with the single executive body. For more details of the legal forms of incorporation and statutory company organs of Russian companies, see Dolgopyatova et al (2009) and Iwasaki (2007a;2013). 8 Quite a few articles have been published in Russian as well as international comparative studies that include Russia, which we will not mention here because they have already been cited by Muravyev (2017).…”
Section: Stylized Facts Of the Corporate Governance System In Russia:mentioning
confidence: 99%