2019
DOI: 10.1080/13675567.2019.1683522
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Firm innovation and supply chain resilience: a dynamic capability perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
142
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 219 publications
(184 citation statements)
references
References 121 publications
11
142
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…“Change” dimension (6 items) represents the stimulus and intention of the organisation for renewal, transformation and improvement in challenging environments. It embraces attributes related to quality management ( Ates & Bititci, 2011 ; Marwa, 2012 ; Øgland, 2008 ), creativity and innovation ( Marwa & Milner, 2013 ; Sabahi & Parast, 2020 ), organisational learning and knowledge management ( Godwin & Amah, 2013 ; Ma et al, 2018 ), and change management ( Ates & Bititci, 2011 ; Morais-Storz et al, 2018 ). All items of resilience predictors were measured on a seven-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 (“strongly disagree”) to 7 (“strongly agree”).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…“Change” dimension (6 items) represents the stimulus and intention of the organisation for renewal, transformation and improvement in challenging environments. It embraces attributes related to quality management ( Ates & Bititci, 2011 ; Marwa, 2012 ; Øgland, 2008 ), creativity and innovation ( Marwa & Milner, 2013 ; Sabahi & Parast, 2020 ), organisational learning and knowledge management ( Godwin & Amah, 2013 ; Ma et al, 2018 ), and change management ( Ates & Bititci, 2011 ; Morais-Storz et al, 2018 ). All items of resilience predictors were measured on a seven-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 (“strongly disagree”) to 7 (“strongly agree”).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this purpose and based on the literature, different actions can be suggested. Sabahi and Parast (2020) suggest that an innovative environment improves organisation resilience to disruptions, because innovation reinforces capabilities that positively influence risk management capability. Verreynne, Williams, Ritchie, Gronum, and Betts (2019) also emphasise the need to deepen the role of innovation in improving tourism organisations' resilience.…”
Section: Conceptual Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The idea of experimentation for innovation is not new, but the idea to opt for multiple small experiments to develop strategic agility or resilience is [81]. In our context, such a way of approaching innovation has two major advantages: it prepares a variety of options in advance, while limiting the risk of "big" failure [82]. It, therefore, optimizes resource allocation instead of a potentially inefficient and costly accumulation of resources to guarantee slack.…”
Section: Building the Strategically Resilient-agile Organization A Kementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Resilience is originally concept of ecology where it refers capability of individual, group or even the system, but its application has been expanded into social and behavioural sciences [ 3 ]. Recently, as logical extension the concept is applied in economics and organisation studies as stated in Sabahi et al [ 4 ], Haase et al [ 5 ] or Herbane [ 6 ]. In general, resilience denotes the capacity for continuous reconstruction [ 7 ].…”
Section: Resilience By Digitalmentioning
confidence: 99%