Firebrands and spotting ignition in large-scale fires

Abstract

Spotting ignition by lofted firebrands is a significant mechanism of fire spread, as observed in many large-scale fires. The role of firebrands in fire propagation and the important parameters involved in spot fire development are studied. Historical large-scale fires, including wind-driven urban and wildland conflagrations and post-earthquake fires are given as examples. In addition, research on firebrand behaviour is reviewed. The phenomenon of spotting fires comprises three sequential mechanisms: generation, transport and ignition of recipient fuel. In order to understand these mechanisms, many experiments have been performed, such as measuring drag on firebrands, analysing the flow fields of flame and plume structures, collecting firebrands from burning materials, houses and wildfires, and observing firebrand burning characteristics in wind tunnels under the terminal velocity condition and ignition characteristics of fuel beds. The knowledge obtained from the experiments was used to develop firebrand models. Since Tarifa developed a firebrand model based on the terminal velocity approximation, many firebrand transport models have been developed to predict maximum spot fire distance. Combustion models of a firebrand were developed empirically and the maximum spot fire distance was found at the burnout limit. Recommendations for future research and development are provided.

A Surface Observation Based Climatology of Diablo-Like Winds in California’s Wine Country and Western Sierra Nevada

“…A prescient preliminary analysis of 'Santa Ana-like' winds in the Oakland Hills was performed in 1973 [16], some 18 years prior to the Oakland Hills fire of 1991, and analyses [17][18][19] subsequent to that fire confirmed their localization at the eastern San Francisco Bay Area. Some time thereafter, colloquial usage of the term "Diablo winds" by the National Weather Service expanded to include the Bay area in general (Jan Null, personal communication), in agreement with news stories on the October 2017 Northern California firestorm.…”

A fire modeling approach to assess wildfire exposure of valued resources in central Navarra, Spain

“…These fires overwhelm fire suppression capabilities despite the fact that suppression resource levels and fire crew training are better than ever before (WWF 2006, Cardil et al 2013b). In recent years, not only in the USA, Canada or Australia but also in the Mediterranean basin, extreme fire behavior events have exhibited fire-line intensities, spreading and massive spotting (Koo et al 2010;Molina et al 2010) that have made them resistant to suppression efforts until a change in weather (i.e., wind speed reduction and relative humidity increase) or in fuel load and continuity (Finney 2007;Werth et al 2011). These events have challenged fire risk management activities and policies and revealed the need to integrate fire risk mitigation into landscape management actions, through fire ignition prevention plans and strategies to reduce fuel load and continuity (Fernandes et al 2013).…”

Probabilistic prediction of wildfire economic losses to housing in Cyprus using Bayesian network analysis

“…The fire impact may be at various intensity levels and may include convective heating or direct contact of the flames, radiant heat flux from nearby flames and airborne firebrands (Cohen 2000;Koo et al 2010;Mell et al 2010). Focusing on the effect of meteorology on fire characteristics, Blanchi et al (2010) analysed the relationship between house loss and the fire weather under which it occurred and found that virtually all of the losses occurred under extreme conditions.…”

“…Structure flammability depends on exterior construction materials (e.g. roof type and roof material influence the ignition by firebrands (Koo et al 2010;Gibbons et al 2012)) and construction design (e.g. number, size and characteristics of openings).…”