2004
DOI: 10.1063/1.1776331
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite size effects in stress analysis of interconnect structures

Abstract: Conventional formulations of thermal stress evolution in interconnect structures usually ignore the interface integrity between the various levels. In this letter we present thermal and residual stress versus temperature data from simple copper thin-film structures on silicon. The results indicate that interconnection models which assume fully elastic behavior and perfectly bonded interfaces may yield inaccurate predictions of the thermo-mechanical response for feature sizes smaller than 10μm.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both experiment and theoretical analyses show that the interfacial slip greatly influences the stress distribution inside the layer. 20,25 Therefore, the deflection and curvature of the bilayer are affected. The interface layer models including the shear-lag model 26 and lap-shear model 27,28 can be used to model the nonideal case by allowing interfacial slip.…”
Section: Timoshenko's Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both experiment and theoretical analyses show that the interfacial slip greatly influences the stress distribution inside the layer. 20,25 Therefore, the deflection and curvature of the bilayer are affected. The interface layer models including the shear-lag model 26 and lap-shear model 27,28 can be used to model the nonideal case by allowing interfacial slip.…”
Section: Timoshenko's Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All these above will reduce the overall interface adhesion for sure [5]. Both experiment and theoretical analysis show that the analysis of rigid interface model errors more and more when the size of film-substrate composite shrinks in micron order [1,2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 --Ec/i=2X1O0 parameters ( i.e. Eo, Go and 77) [1,2], so the thickness of 0~~~~~~-0.03 both the film and substrate is changed in Fig. 3 to show the effect of layer dimensions.…”
Section: S-l Model Ofnon-ideal Interfacementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations