2006
DOI: 10.1063/1.2178400
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applicability range of Stoney’s formula and modified formulas for a film/substrate bilayer

Abstract: In addition to the layer thickness and effective Young's modulus, the impact of the kinematic assumptions, interfacial condition, in-plane force, boundary conditions, and structure dimensions on the curvature of a film/substrate bilayer is examined. Different models for the analysis of the bilayer curvature are compared. It is demonstrated in our model that the assumption of a uniform curvature is valid only if there is no in-plane force. The effects of boundary conditions and structure dimensions, which are n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
28
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
4
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The exact nonlinear curvature definition is κ = w xx /(1 + w 2 x ) 3/2 . Curvature κ is directly related to the strain of bending beam, and thus system potential energy [36][37][38]. For the structures of tension-dominant nonlinearity and large aspect ratio, such linear curvature ap-proximation is sufficiently accurate [45] and this curvatureinduced nonlinearity in the structures of tension-dominant nonlinearity is also shown negligible in our results.…”
Section: Tension-dominant Nonlinearitysupporting
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The exact nonlinear curvature definition is κ = w xx /(1 + w 2 x ) 3/2 . Curvature κ is directly related to the strain of bending beam, and thus system potential energy [36][37][38]. For the structures of tension-dominant nonlinearity and large aspect ratio, such linear curvature ap-proximation is sufficiently accurate [45] and this curvatureinduced nonlinearity in the structures of tension-dominant nonlinearity is also shown negligible in our results.…”
Section: Tension-dominant Nonlinearitysupporting
confidence: 52%
“…The built-in strain [16], fabrication process [18,36], residual stress [37] and surface stress [38] dx is the tension due to (nonlinear) midplane stretching [39]. The beam is modeled as the EulerBernoulli beam which requires the relatively large aspect ratio of length to thickness/radius and the shear effects are thus neglected.…”
Section: Tension-dominant Nonlinearitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stoney's formula [68][69][70][71][72][73] was extensively used to describe the residual stress of the film-substrate system produced by thermal change/phase transition/shrinkage of devices during the preparation and post-treatment process. The formula is the theoretical basis of curvature-based technique to evaluate the interface stress status in the film-substrate system.…”
Section: Stoney's Formulamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper the immovable edge constraint is imposed, which also implicitly indicates that the film edges are not delaminated. The boundary conditions and the film length also play important roles of the film/substrate bilayer deflection induced by the interfacial stress [22] , which are also incorporated in this model. It is noticed that in Huang and Suo's perturbation solutions [18,19] periodic boundary conditions are implicitly assumed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%