2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11668-016-0073-6
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite Element Modeling of Magnetic Flux Leakage from Metal Loss Defects in Steel Pipeline

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Usually, however, the signal from the far-side defect is weaker than the signal from the near-side defect of identical shape and size. Results of a numerical analysis carried out by Sorabh et al [1] confirm this statement for the same 50% metal losses located on the opposite sides of the wall. Therefore, one can claim that there is a risk of underestimation of defect dimensions, especially its depth, in situation when a far-side defect is classified as a near-side one.…”
Section: Terms Describing Defectsmentioning
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Usually, however, the signal from the far-side defect is weaker than the signal from the near-side defect of identical shape and size. Results of a numerical analysis carried out by Sorabh et al [1] confirm this statement for the same 50% metal losses located on the opposite sides of the wall. Therefore, one can claim that there is a risk of underestimation of defect dimensions, especially its depth, in situation when a far-side defect is classified as a near-side one.…”
Section: Terms Describing Defectsmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…internal [1][2][3][4][5][6][7] inner/inside [8,9], near-side/surface [10][11][12][13], top [14][15][16], front [17], front-side [18,19] external [1][2][3][4][5][6][7], outer/outside [8,20], far-side/surface [10][11][12][13]21], bottom [14][15][16]22], back [17], back-side [18,19,[23][24][25][26], opposite-side [27], sub-surface [28] side' are probably most unequivocal and universal, so these two terms are generally used in the rest of this article.…”
Section: Terms Describing Defectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MR Kandroodi [ 13 ] proposed an axial flux detection algorithm for defect detection based on image processing approaches and morphological methods, which was validated through examinations of simulated defects and real experimental MFL data. Sorabh [ 14 ] proposed a three-dimensional finite element model and static simulation that studied the dependency of the characteristic defect dimensions and the leakage flux signal. In recent years, with the development of artificial intelligence, deep-learning methods have been applied in the field of pipeline MFL inspection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a noncontact nondestructive testing method for stress concentration and plastic deformation [3][4][5]. However, the current research on the mechanism of magnetic memory effect of stress is far from conclusive [6][7][8][9]. The magnetic memory mechanism and signal characteristics are explained from different perspectives by a lot of researches, but there is no definite conclusion on them [10][11][12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%