2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.04.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite element analysis of dynamic progressive failure of carbon fiber composite laminates under low velocity impact

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
70
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 195 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
6
70
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Currently, FRP failures are generally considered to be fiber failures, matrix failures, and interlayer delamination failures [13][14][15][16][17][18]. However, during actual deformation and destruction the in-layer delamination is also a possible failure mode.…”
Section: Failure Criteria and Damage Evolution Laws For Unidirectionamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Currently, FRP failures are generally considered to be fiber failures, matrix failures, and interlayer delamination failures [13][14][15][16][17][18]. However, during actual deformation and destruction the in-layer delamination is also a possible failure mode.…”
Section: Failure Criteria and Damage Evolution Laws For Unidirectionamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Hashin criterion [10], the Puck criterion [11], and the Chang-Chang criterion [12] are the most commonly used failure criteria for FRP, nowadays. Many researchers [13][14][15][16][17][18] had studied the low-velocity impact problems of FRP component based on these three criteria. However, these studies always ignored the in-layer delamination of FRP which is an important failure mode when the thickness of unidirectional FRP lamina is large.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many scholars have proposed different numerical‐simulation methods to analyze the energy dissipation of composite materials through dynamic impact . Kathiresan et al used ABAQUS/Explicit method to analyze the axial crushing energy absorption of a composite conic tube.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hashin criteria comprehensively considers the various damage modes such as fibre ruptures in tension, matrix cracking due to transverse tension and shear, fibre compressive damage (buckling or kinking) and matrix crushing under transverse compression and shear effect (Hoffman 1967). Hashin criteria have been proved that it is effective method to predict ply based damage initiation Feng and Aymerich 2014;Farooq and Myler 2016;Johnson et al 2006;Liu et al 2016;Li et al 2014b), however, based on the experimental observation, the matrix compressive crack is always formed with an angle through the ply thickness whereas Hashin criteria are less able to simulate this process. Puck and Schurmann (1998) developed a damage model for transverse compression.…”
Section: ð2:13þmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The damage model used the strains at damage onset and at complete damage, effectively defined the damage variable for degradation and accurately captured the damage progression for composite laminates Donadon et al 2008;Faggiani and Falzon 2010;Feng and Aymerich 2014;Liu et al 2016;Topac et al 2017), which a typical damage variable defined for tensile damage mode is shown in Eq. (2.30).…”
Section: ð2:13þmentioning
confidence: 99%