2012
DOI: 10.1108/00021461211250492
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Financial ratio analysis using ARMS data

Abstract: Purpose -The purpose of this research is to evaluate the financial performance measures calculated and reported by the Economic Resource Service (ERS) from Agricultural Resource Management Survey (ARMS) data. The evaluation includes the calculation method and the underlying assumptions used in obtaining the reported values. Recommendations for improving the information reported are proposed to ERS. Design/methodology/approach -The financial measures calculated and reported are compared with those recommended b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
28
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The analysis is based on data from the Agricultural Resource Management Survey (ARMS) The five measures of the financial performance of U.S. farms represented by the respective financial ratios are: liquidity (current ratio), solvency (debt-to-asset ratio), profitability (return on assets as well as operating profit margin ratio), efficiency (operating expense ratio), and repayment capacity (term debt coverage ratio). Table 1 shows the formulas used to calculate these financial ratios, based on recommendations from the Farm Financial Standards Council (Ahrendsen and Katchova, 2012). Each financial ratio is classified as being in the critical zone if it exceeds a critical threshold, indicating that farmers are experiencing financial stress.…”
Section: Models and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis is based on data from the Agricultural Resource Management Survey (ARMS) The five measures of the financial performance of U.S. farms represented by the respective financial ratios are: liquidity (current ratio), solvency (debt-to-asset ratio), profitability (return on assets as well as operating profit margin ratio), efficiency (operating expense ratio), and repayment capacity (term debt coverage ratio). Table 1 shows the formulas used to calculate these financial ratios, based on recommendations from the Farm Financial Standards Council (Ahrendsen and Katchova, 2012). Each financial ratio is classified as being in the critical zone if it exceeds a critical threshold, indicating that farmers are experiencing financial stress.…”
Section: Models and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An article by Ahrendsen and Katchova [20] compared the financial ratios suggested by the American Farm Financial Standards Council [40] with those reported by the Agricultural Resource Management Survey (ARMS) [41]. A corresponding comparison does not exist for the pan-European FADN; whose 'standard results' do cover just a few high level financial ratios, such as farm net income and cash-flow, which apart from income per family work unit are all absolute figures [42].…”
Section: Framework Of Analysis: Financial Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…European assessment approaches prevalently use three indicators to depict the economic sustainability: profitability, liquidity and stability [4,15,16]. Further indicators, less prominently addressed by literature, deal with productivity, autonomy, resilience, solvency, repayment capacity, financial efficiency and local economy [17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, to the extent that the relative solvency-based financial indicator depends also on the debt-to-asset ratio which has a long right tail, this measure of economic well-being hence cannot be calculated for the relatively few farming operations that own no assets (Ahrendsen and Katchova 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%