2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Financial development and environmental quality: The way forward

Abstract: The present paper re-examines the asymmetric impact of financial development on environmental quality in Pakistan for the period 1985Q1 to 2014Q4. A comprehensive index of financial development is generated using Bank-and Stock market-based financial development indicators. The results show that inefficient use of energy adversely affects the environmental quality. This suggests adoption of energy efficient technology at both production and consumption levels. These technologies would be helpful to improve env… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

20
160
2
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 363 publications
(185 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
(57 reference statements)
20
160
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Mahmood and Alkhateeb [18] claimed that the results of the symmetrical investigation, in the presence of significant asymmetry in the model, may become a reason of misspecification of the model and may as a result generate biased estimates. Although the asymmetrical effects of FMD and income on Pakistani CO 2 emissions have been tested in [34] by ignoring the testing of the EKC hypothesis, this current study extends the scope of the model by analyzing asymmetrical effects of FMD and energy consumption along with testing the EKC hypothesis which is missing by [34]. Therefore, considering both asymmetrical effects and EKC may be claimed unique and a contribution in the global environment literature.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Mahmood and Alkhateeb [18] claimed that the results of the symmetrical investigation, in the presence of significant asymmetry in the model, may become a reason of misspecification of the model and may as a result generate biased estimates. Although the asymmetrical effects of FMD and income on Pakistani CO 2 emissions have been tested in [34] by ignoring the testing of the EKC hypothesis, this current study extends the scope of the model by analyzing asymmetrical effects of FMD and energy consumption along with testing the EKC hypothesis which is missing by [34]. Therefore, considering both asymmetrical effects and EKC may be claimed unique and a contribution in the global environment literature.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…In Equation (1), we assume a quadratic impact of income per capita on per capita CO 2 emissions to validate the EKC in the traditional way. Further, Shahbaz et al [34] proposed to test the asymmetrical effects of FMD and energy consumption on the CO 2 emissions. Following Shin et al [38], we introduce the nonlinear or asymmetrical effects of FM t and EC t by converting each variable into positive and negative variables in the following way:…”
Section: Model and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Pakistan, several studies have been done in the past to see the impact of financial development, power and economic on CO 2 emissions. Some of the major studies in this regard done by [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. An investigation has been conducted by in [6] that investigated the long-run cointegration association between monetary instability and ecological degradation in Pakistan for the period 1971-2009 using time-series analysis.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors use panel fully modified OLS estimators (FMOLS), rejecting the existence of the EKC for their sample countries. Last, Shahbaz et al () re‐examine the asymmetric impact of financial development on environmental quality in Pakistan for the period 1985–2014 using quarterly data. Their approach is similar to ours in the sense that they use comprehensive indices of financial development generated by using bank and stock market based financial development indicators.…”
Section: Review Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%