Does Financial Development Affect Environmental Degradation? Evidence from the OECD Countries

Abstract

In this study, building a simple model that incorporates static and dynamic elements, the relationship of financial development and economic growth to environmental degradation is investigated together with the validation of the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) hypothesis. Our analysis is based on an unbalanced panel data set covering the OECD countries over the period 1970–2014. Our approach thoroughly accounts for the presence of cross‐sectional dependence between the sample variables and utilizes second generation panel unit root tests in order to investigate possible cointegration relationships. The empirical findings do indicate that local (NOx per capita emissions) and global (CO2 per capita emissions) pollutants redefine the EKC hypothesis when we account for the presence of financial development indicators. Specifically, in the case of global pollution an N‐shape relationship is evident in both static and dynamic frameworks, with a very slow adjustment. Lastly, our study calls for a strengthening of the effectiveness of environmental degradation policies by ensuring sustainability of the OECD banking system in order to drastically reduce emissions. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment

The impact of women leaders on environmental performance: Evidence on gender diversity in banks

“…In line with Halkos and Polemis (), bank‐level interpolation was used with our dataset, when appropriate in cases of missing values. Logistic and natural logarithmic smoothing techniques were applied to predict the missing values of unitary indices and all the other positive variables, respectively.…”

Modeling the dynamic linkage between financial development, energy innovation, and environmental quality: Does globalization matter?

“…There is an ongoing debate on EKC, and scholars present different views on the role of income in mitigating pollution due to various pollution reduction patterns across regions and countries. Some studies support the existence of EKC (Baloch, Mahmood, & Zhang, 2019; Dong, Sun, & Hochman, 2017; Halkos & Polemis, 2017; Jebli, Youssef, & Ozturk, 2016), whereas others do not confirm EKC (Ozturk, 2015; Sohag, Kalugina, & Samargandi, 2019; Tedino, 2017). At the initial stage, economic development increases environmental pollution due scale effect because economic growth exploits natural resources, promotes industrialization, and intensifies agriculture (Baloch et al, 2019).…”

Sustainable development, environmental policy and renewable energy use: A dynamic panel data approach

“…Halkos and Polemis (), argue that local (NO x per capita emissions) and global (CO 2 per capita emissions) pollutants redefine the EKC hypothesis when financial development indicators are taken into consideration. They find that in the case of global pollution an N‐shaped relationship is evident in both static and dynamic frameworks with a very slow adjustment.…”