Field Measurement of Suction, Water Content, and Water Permeability

Abstract

This paper presents a review of techniques for field measurement of suction, water content, and water hydraulic conductivity (permeability). Main problems in the use of field tensiometers are addressed and hints on how to improve tensiometer performance are given. Advantages and limitations of instruments for indirect measurement of suction including electrical conductivity sensors, thermal conductivity sensors, dielectric permittivity sensors, filter paper, and psychrometer are discussed. Techniques for water content measurement based on dielectric methods are then presented. These include time and amplitude domain reflectometry and capacitance. Finally, a brief overview of methods for measurement of water permeability in the field is presented.

Comparative microclimate and dewfall measurements at an urban green roof versus bitumen roof

“…Comparing both calibration curves, there is a strong indication for a temperature dependency. This is already known for soil sensors using time domain reflectrometry [42]. Higher temperatures correspond to lower permittivity of free water molecules and the amount of free water molecules depends on temperature variation.…”

A review of the methods available for estimating soil moisture and its implications for water resource management

“…The measurement is related to the physico-chemical properties of the soil (Keys, 1989). The instrument requires a trained operator due to the use of the radioactive source and is potentially hazardous to health and the environment (Tarantino et al, 2008). The equipment is expensive and requires extensive soil specific calibrations, which limits its use.…”

Monitoring of saline tracer movement with vertically distributed self-potential measurements at the HOBE agricultural test site, Voulund, Denmark

“…Quantification of water fluxes in the vadose zone is essential for many hydrological and environmental applications. Classical approaches based on matric potentials or tracer test data (e.g., Vereecken et al, 2008;Tarantino et al, 2009) are limited by the punctual nature of such measurements. The data might be strongly influenced by local heterogeneities and water fluxes are obtained indirectly by differencing.…”