2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00604-013-1071-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fibers coated with a graphene-polyaniline nanocomposite for the headspace solid-phase microextraction of organochlorine pesticides from seawater samples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The roughness of the structure provided by graphene and CTAB resulted in a higher surface area and more extraction efficiency of analytes in SPME approach. The SEM image of a common polyaniline fiber not containing graphene and CTAB, with a smooth surface, can be found in a report by Li [22] and Mehdinia [23].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The roughness of the structure provided by graphene and CTAB resulted in a higher surface area and more extraction efficiency of analytes in SPME approach. The SEM image of a common polyaniline fiber not containing graphene and CTAB, with a smooth surface, can be found in a report by Li [22] and Mehdinia [23].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Compared to Ref. 23, this method provides faster and simpler synthesis of composite (about 20 min compared to 24 h of the previously reported study) and requires less amounts of aniline. The extraction efficiencies of two types of graphene/polyaniline fibers (with and without the presence of CTAB) were studied (Fig.…”
Section: Methods Validation and Application To The Biological Samplesmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…What's more, the centrifugation or filtration step which was used in traditional QuEChERS method containing GCB or C18 was omitted in the proposed method [18,19,21,22,36], so it has the advantages of simplicity and rapidity. In whole, compared to other methods for the determination of OCPs in tobacco [22], water [29,[32][33][34][35], fruit and vegetable samples [36], the method in this study has the advantages of simple to operate, low cost and high clean-up ability.…”
Section: Compared With Other Methodsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…For example, graphenebased adsorbent has been used as adsorbent for the analysis of organochlorine pesticide (OCPs) [29,[32][33][34][35]. To our best knowledge, the application of magnetic graphene-based materials as QuEChERS adsorbent for the determination of OCPs has not been reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…These features endow nanoporous carbons with potential for the applications for electrochemical capacitation, gas adsorption, catalysis, and sensing [7][8][9]. Moreover, some of them, such as carbon nanotubes [10,11], glassy carbon films [12], activated carbon [13], graphene [14] and fullerene [15], have already been used in SPME.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%