2016
DOI: 10.1038/npjgenmed.2016.13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FetalQuantSD: accurate quantification of fetal DNA fraction by shallow-depth sequencing of maternal plasma DNA

Abstract: Noninvasive prenatal testing using massively parallel sequencing of maternal plasma DNA has been rapidly adopted in clinical use worldwide. Fetal DNA fraction in a maternal plasma sample is an important parameter for accurate interpretations of these tests. However, there is a lack of methods involving low-sequencing depth and yet would allow a robust and accurate determination of fetal DNA fraction in maternal plasma for all pregnancies. In this study, we have developed a new method to accurately quantify the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
30
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(51 reference statements)
0
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Methods including SANEFALCON [ 27 ], which makes use of nucleosome profiling to assess fetal fraction, and SEQFF [ 24 ], which uses a high dimensional regression model of existing NIPT sequencing data, can be used to assess fetal fraction in pregnancies with a fetus of either sex. FetalQuant SD has been recently developed for fetal fraction quantification, based on shallow-depth WGS, using SNPs absent from the maternal genome at regions where the mother is homozygous for the alternative allele [ 41 ] However, all of these methods are based on whole genome sequencing; we wanted to develop a relatively inexpensive targeted amplicon-based approach which could be used in conjunction with our RMD assays for single-gene disorders, such as β-thalassaemia. Whole genome sequencing to assess the fetal fraction in these instances would be prohibitively expensive, whereas we can multiplex our targeted indel panel onto a run with the single-gene disorder samples with little impact on the number of reads that we obtain for the β-thalassaemia targets.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methods including SANEFALCON [ 27 ], which makes use of nucleosome profiling to assess fetal fraction, and SEQFF [ 24 ], which uses a high dimensional regression model of existing NIPT sequencing data, can be used to assess fetal fraction in pregnancies with a fetus of either sex. FetalQuant SD has been recently developed for fetal fraction quantification, based on shallow-depth WGS, using SNPs absent from the maternal genome at regions where the mother is homozygous for the alternative allele [ 41 ] However, all of these methods are based on whole genome sequencing; we wanted to develop a relatively inexpensive targeted amplicon-based approach which could be used in conjunction with our RMD assays for single-gene disorders, such as β-thalassaemia. Whole genome sequencing to assess the fetal fraction in these instances would be prohibitively expensive, whereas we can multiplex our targeted indel panel onto a run with the single-gene disorder samples with little impact on the number of reads that we obtain for the β-thalassaemia targets.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10,11 A recent method only genotyped the mother. 12 It first identified maternal homozygous loci, tallied and computed nonmaternal allele fractions at these loci from low-coverage sequencing data of maternal plasma, and used these to train a linear model to predict FF. High-depth targeted sequencing of maternal plasma was successfully used to determine FF.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the existing approaches used to determine the fetal fraction, the Y chromosomal sequence‐based approach calculated from the proportion of Y chromosome is simple and accurate, but only for male fetuses . Single‐nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)–based approach depends on the analysis of fetal‐specific alleles inherited from the father being direct, but it requires at least the prior maternal genotype information to identify the informative SNP loci . The methylation‐based method depends on the fetal‐specific epigenetic changes and is generally less accurate, requiring a separate processing step involving methylation‐sensitive restriction enzymes digestion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%