2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41436-019-0636-5
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inferring fetal fractions from read heterozygosity empowers the noninvasive prenatal screening

Abstract: Purpose: Fetal fraction (FF) is the percent of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in the mother's peripheral blood that is of fetal origin, which plays a pivotal role in noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS). We present a method that can reliably estimate FFs by examining autosome single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs).Methods: Even at a very low sequencing depth, there are plenty of SNPs covered by more than one read. At those SNPs, we define read heterozygosity and demonstrate that the percent of read heterozygosity is a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(20 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many studies have improved existing FF calculation methods. These improvements include enrichment of cffDNA, optimization of sequencing conditions, improvement of bioinformatics algorithms, and maximization of differences in maternal and fetal DNA fragment sizes (117,(124)(125)(126)(127)(128) NIPS to screen for and exclude shorter circulating cell-free DNA fragments from the total circulating cell-free DNA and then evaluated FF through Y-chromosome reads, which increased FF by 99-359% (128). After optimization, FF in a twin NIPS false-negative sample was increased by 23.1%.…”
Section: Management Of Pregnant Women With Failed Results Owing To a Low Ffmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies have improved existing FF calculation methods. These improvements include enrichment of cffDNA, optimization of sequencing conditions, improvement of bioinformatics algorithms, and maximization of differences in maternal and fetal DNA fragment sizes (117,(124)(125)(126)(127)(128) NIPS to screen for and exclude shorter circulating cell-free DNA fragments from the total circulating cell-free DNA and then evaluated FF through Y-chromosome reads, which increased FF by 99-359% (128). After optimization, FF in a twin NIPS false-negative sample was increased by 23.1%.…”
Section: Management Of Pregnant Women With Failed Results Owing To a Low Ffmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, gene amplification may produce allele dropout on account of highly fragmented cfDNA. Furthermore, we deduced fetal genotypes depended on SNP and SNP-based FF in this study, however, maternal inbreeding coefficient and sequencing error would affect the accuracy of inferring SNP and FF (Dang et al, 2019). To resolve this problem, we also detected wbcDNA besides cfDNA so that can improve the precision of FF estimation by inferring maternal inbreeding coefficient and combining reads from maternal wbcDNA and cfDNA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thirdly, in the prediction of monogenic disease, the FF is also a key parameter 5,6 to determine the statistical thresholds to ensure the statistical significance. Lastly, when FF is accurately known, a more powerful test to screen for fetal trisomy can be developed 28,33 and the fetal sex determination in twin pregnancies 34,35 also becomes a much simpler problem. The ability of measuring FF with high accuracy would make LDFF serve as a valuable tool to improve NIPT performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another method calculates the distribution of reads starting around nucleosome positions based on the different DNA digestion between fetal and maternal cfDNA 26 , but its accuracy is relatively poor 27 . The third one makes use of the heterozygosity of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), however its accuracy might be limited for samples with sequencing depth <0.5x 28 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%