2019
DOI: 10.1002/pd.5597
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of fetal DNA fraction estimation and its application in noninvasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy detection in multiple pregnancies

Abstract: Objective To analyze the fetal fraction, fetal sex, and chromosomal aneuploidy in multiple pregnancies using noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT). Method A total of 362 pregnant women including 203 singleton pregnancies, 69 twins, and 90 higher‐order multiple pregnancies were recruited. Fetal fractions estimated by size ratio‐based and Y chromosome‐based approaches in singleton pregnancies with male fetus were used as source data to establish the model. The model was then applied to multiple pregnancies for fet… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Few labs have performed NIPT in triplets and higher-order multiples, as large data sets are difficult to collect. Correct interpretation of NIPT and accurate determination of fetal sex seem achievable in triplet pregnancies, 2,21 as demonstrated in our cohort of 25 triplets, but more studies with larger cohorts and positive cases are required. In our opinion, NIPT would be a valuable screening option for higherorder multiples, because maternal serum markers cannot be applied and current screening is based on ultrasonography and maternal age only.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Few labs have performed NIPT in triplets and higher-order multiples, as large data sets are difficult to collect. Correct interpretation of NIPT and accurate determination of fetal sex seem achievable in triplet pregnancies, 2,21 as demonstrated in our cohort of 25 triplets, but more studies with larger cohorts and positive cases are required. In our opinion, NIPT would be a valuable screening option for higherorder multiples, because maternal serum markers cannot be applied and current screening is based on ultrasonography and maternal age only.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Studies on the accuracy of NIPT in twin pregnancies are limited and include relatively small numbers. 2,[15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] This study reports on one of the largest cohorts of women with a twin gestation undergoing screening for aneuploidy with NIPT, and demonstrates high sensitivity and specificity for detection of trisomy 21 in dichorionic-diamniotic twins.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…56 That review included only population-based studies and did not include eight additional studies that were either of case/control design or were published after that review was completed. 53,55,[58][59][60][61][62][63] Table 2 predictive values are expected to be similar to those found in screen positive singleton pregnancies.…”
Section: Cell Free (Cf)dna Screening Performance In Twin Pregnanciesmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Additionally, based on the previously reported combined FF value in twin pregnancies (ranging from approx. 7% to 35%) [31], we did not suppose dropout probability d = 0 for individual fetus because it is fallacious for the minor contributors of cfDNA mixtures. Instead, we set the min.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%