2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2011.09.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fertility sparing therapy for metastatic gestational trophoblastic disease in young patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hysterectomy is generally not necessary, but is an option for patients who are no longer interested in future fertility and may be necessary for patients unresponsive to multi-agent chemotherapy [5]. However, some patients with future fertility desire and unresponsive to chemotherapy may benefit from partial hysterectomy or tumor resection from the uterus [14,15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hysterectomy is generally not necessary, but is an option for patients who are no longer interested in future fertility and may be necessary for patients unresponsive to multi-agent chemotherapy [5]. However, some patients with future fertility desire and unresponsive to chemotherapy may benefit from partial hysterectomy or tumor resection from the uterus [14,15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are few publications, describing urgent localized uterine resection, followed by uterine reconstruction [6,[14][15][16][17][18]. The limited number of clinical observations is apparently caused by the fact that such treatment option was considered as wrong earlier.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The issue concerning the uterus organ-preserving surgeries has been little studied up to now, especially in metastatic GTN [14]. Indications, contra-indications and complications after such surgeries are not described in the literature.…”
Section: Low-invasive Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%