1997
DOI: 10.1007/s100169900039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Femorodistal Bypass Using Cryopreserved Venous Allografts for Limb Salvage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39] Comparison was made difficult because these grafts were used for different indications (some for replacement of infected grafts) and because different methods of harvesting, preservation, and immunosuppressive therapy were used. Through careful graft selection, meticulous immunosuppressive therapy with cyclosporine, and careful follow-up, we could obtain 1-year secondary patency comparable with the best published results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39] Comparison was made difficult because these grafts were used for different indications (some for replacement of infected grafts) and because different methods of harvesting, preservation, and immunosuppressive therapy were used. Through careful graft selection, meticulous immunosuppressive therapy with cyclosporine, and careful follow-up, we could obtain 1-year secondary patency comparable with the best published results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Arterialization of venous grafts is reflected by neointimal hyperplasia (NH), but may occur excessively or uncontrolled at the proximal anastomosis site, resulting in highly rigid lesions requiring aggressive treatment such as cutting balloon angioplasty or surgery enabling secondary patency rates of 45-63 % at 12 months (Kreienberg et al 2007;Leseche et al 1997;Zehr et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For below-knee bypass, Selke et al 25 and Walker et al 26 reported secondary patency rates of 33% at 20 months and 37% at 18 months, respectively. For infrapopliteal bypass, Leseche et al 27 and Martin et al 28 reported 52% at 1 year and 11% at 4 years, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%