2006
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(06)68782-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Female genital mutilation and obstetric outcome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to the general health problems caused by FGM, like urinary track infections and recurrent local infections, FGM has obstetrical consequences, especially in cases of infibulation (Vangen et al 2002;Eke and Nkanginieme 2006;Small et al 2008;Carolan 2010;Boama and Arulkumaran 2009). Small et al compared pregnancy outcomes for Somali-born women with those of women born in receiving countries.…”
Section: Health Consequencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the general health problems caused by FGM, like urinary track infections and recurrent local infections, FGM has obstetrical consequences, especially in cases of infibulation (Vangen et al 2002;Eke and Nkanginieme 2006;Small et al 2008;Carolan 2010;Boama and Arulkumaran 2009). Small et al compared pregnancy outcomes for Somali-born women with those of women born in receiving countries.…”
Section: Health Consequencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The acquired causes may be iatrogenic including female genital mutation or circumcision4 – 6 and vaginal reconstructive surgeries7 resulting in painful keloid formation, labial adhesions and vulval disfigurement,5 , 6 vulval disease such as lichen sclerosis,8 psychosexual problems leading to vaginismus (often associated with a history of sexual abuse, trauma or rape), or as a result of malunion of stress and insufficiency pelvic fractures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We searched all original articles that were published between 1966 to 2006 on FGM (k=789). The search for the later resulted in the selection of five (5) eligible articles ( 25-27, 29, 30) whereas the former resulted in seven (7) eligible articles (10,(15)(16)(17)(18)(21)(22)(23). As part of the exclusion criteria, we included only the most comprehensive articles from author/s if two (2) or more articles were published on the same study population in different years.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%