2005
DOI: 10.1088/0264-9381/22/14/018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feedforward correction of mirror misalignment fluctuations for the GEO 600 gravitational wave detector

Abstract: The core instrument of the GEO 600 gravitational wave detector is a Michelson interferometer with folded arms. The five main optics that form this interferometer are suspended in vacuum by triple pendulums with quasimonolithic lower stages of fused silica. After installation of these pendulums in early 2003, a larger than expected coupling of longitudinal ground motion to tilt misalignment of the suspended optics was observed. Because of this, the uncontrolled misalignment of the optics during average conditio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(39 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although a variety of control techniques exist, (e.g. both feedback and feedforward [9] control are used within GEO 600), we consider only the most commonly used control type at GEO 600, linear inverting feedback. This works by measuring the deviation of a parameter of a given system (the plant) from a desired operating point.…”
Section: Example Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although a variety of control techniques exist, (e.g. both feedback and feedforward [9] control are used within GEO 600), we consider only the most commonly used control type at GEO 600, linear inverting feedback. This works by measuring the deviation of a parameter of a given system (the plant) from a desired operating point.…”
Section: Example Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• in phase (for a calculation of this, see [9]). Thus, to make time-domain noise subtraction practical, either verified long-term stability of the noise coupling or real-time adaptive monitoring are needed.…”
Section: Technical-noise Subtractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar to other GW detectors, the sensitivity of the instrument is affected both by fundamental noise sources arising from thermal, seismic or quantum mechanical properties of light and by technical ones arising from the various auxiliary control loops that are used to keep it in a stable operating point. The common strategy adopted, principally for seismic and technical noise sources, is to estimate the linear part of the coupling and subtract it off via online feedforward cancellation [10][11][12][13]. Since the strain and auxiliary channel data is saved to disk, it is also possible to perform offline subtraction at a later time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%