2020
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.101.102006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bilinear noise subtraction at the GEO 600 observatory

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As seen in Figure 7, the contribution of these auxiliary channels to the DARM noise is larger than expected based on coherence alone, suggesting nonlinear, bilinear, and/or nonstationary coupling to DARM. Nonstationary coupling has already been observed due to modulation from motion of the angular degrees of freedom, and can be partially removed offline [79,80]. Additional work is required to understand this type of contribution to the interferometer noise floor.…”
Section: G Auxiliary Length Control Noisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As seen in Figure 7, the contribution of these auxiliary channels to the DARM noise is larger than expected based on coherence alone, suggesting nonlinear, bilinear, and/or nonstationary coupling to DARM. Nonstationary coupling has already been observed due to modulation from motion of the angular degrees of freedom, and can be partially removed offline [79,80]. Additional work is required to understand this type of contribution to the interferometer noise floor.…”
Section: G Auxiliary Length Control Noisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the auto-alignment system, residual mirror misalignments can couple directly to the strain signal or through the interlinked cavities. One well-known mechanism is bilinear noise coupling [20], where the Michelson misalignment couples via the SR longitudinal degree. Such a coupling pathway exists since the PRC and SRC share the Michelson.…”
Section: Automatic Alignmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Weiner filtering is particularly useful in cases where a linear coupling exists between the noise source and the gravitational-wave strain data. Additional subtraction procedures based on machine learning [127][128][129] are also being explored. These new methods have shown promise in subtracting sources of noise that exhibit non-linear couplings to the gravitational-wave strain.…”
Section: Noise Subtractionmentioning
confidence: 99%