2005
DOI: 10.1088/0264-9381/23/2/016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linear projection of technical noise for interferometric gravitational-wave detectors

Abstract: An international network of interferometric gravitational-wave detectors is now in operation, and has entered a period of intense commissioning focused on bringing the instruments to their theoretical sensitivity limits. To expedite this process, noise analysis techniques have been developed by the groups associated with each instrument. We present methods of noise analysis that were developed and utilized for the commissioning of the GEO 600 detector. The focal point of this paper is a technique called noise … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

7
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(15 reference statements)
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The phase can be made to fit the data there, with little effect on the rest of the transfer function, by e.g., arbitrarily lengthening the distance between the beamsplitter and the signal-recycling mirror from the measured value of 1.109 to 1.116 m. The notable discrepancies in phase at low frequencies are not yet understood. Figure 8 shows P, Q and noise projections made by multiplying the amplitude spectral density of the power noise at PDI shown in figure 2 by the magnitudes of the measured transfer functions shown in figure 7, as described in [14]. These show that the stabilized input laser power noise is close to limiting the current sensitivity of GEO 600 around 100-200 Hz, but does not contribute significantly at other frequencies.…”
Section: Transfer Functions From Power Noise To the Detector Outputsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The phase can be made to fit the data there, with little effect on the rest of the transfer function, by e.g., arbitrarily lengthening the distance between the beamsplitter and the signal-recycling mirror from the measured value of 1.109 to 1.116 m. The notable discrepancies in phase at low frequencies are not yet understood. Figure 8 shows P, Q and noise projections made by multiplying the amplitude spectral density of the power noise at PDI shown in figure 2 by the magnitudes of the measured transfer functions shown in figure 7, as described in [14]. These show that the stabilized input laser power noise is close to limiting the current sensitivity of GEO 600 around 100-200 Hz, but does not contribute significantly at other frequencies.…”
Section: Transfer Functions From Power Noise To the Detector Outputsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…In GEO 600 it is believed [8] that the noise sources associated with the interferometric measurement of the relative positions of the mirrors (i.e. laser noise, sensing noise, oscillator noise, etc.)…”
Section: Confidential: Not For Distribution Submitted To Iop Publishmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The noise spectrum of the main GW channel comprises noise from many subsystems within the interferometer. Identifying the limiting noise sources and determining how much each contributes to the total noise observed in the main GW channel is a process termed 'noise projections' [5]. The result of a set of noise projections is a 'noise budget'.…”
Section: Noise Projectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%