Federalism and health policy: the intergovernmental committees in Brazil

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To analyze the dynamics of operation of the Bipartite Committees in health care in the Brazilian states.METHODS The research included visits to 24 states, direct observation, document analysis, and performance of semi-structured interviews with state and local leaders. The characterization of each committee was performed between 2007 and 2010, and four dimensions were considered: (i) level of institutionality, classified as advanced, intermediate, or incipient; (ii) agenda of intergovernmental negotiations, classified as diversified/restricted, adapted/not adapted to the reality of each state, and shared/unshared between the state and municipalities; (iii) political processes, considering the character and scope of intergovernmental relations; and (iv) capacity of operation, assessed as high, moderate, or low.RESULTS Ten committees had advanced level of institutionality. The agenda of the negotiations was diversified in all states, and most of them were adapted to the state reality. However, one-third of the committees showed power inequalities between the government levels. Cooperative and interactive intergovernmental relations predominated in 54.0% of the states. The level of institutionality, scope of negotiations, and political processes influenced Bipartite Committees’ ability to formulate policies and coordinate health care at the federal level. Bipartite Committees with a high capacity of operation predominated in the South and Southeast regions, while those with a low capacity of operations predominated in the North and Northeast.CONCLUSIONS The regional differences in operation among Bipartite Interagency Committees suggest the influence of historical-structural variables (socioeconomic development, geographic barriers, characteristics of the health care system) in their capacity of intergovernmental health care management. However, structural problems can be overcome in some states through institutional and political changes. The creation of federal investments, varied by regions and states, is critical in overcoming the structural inequalities that affect political institutions. The operation of Bipartite Committees is a step forward; however, strengthening their ability to coordinate health care is crucial in the regional organization of the health care system in the Brazilian states.

A implementação de redes de atenção e os desafios da governança regional em saúde na Amazônia Legal: uma análise do Projeto QualiSUS-Rede

“…In Alto Solimões and Belém, respondents emphasized that, if on the one hand, the purpose of the project was to qualify RAS, on the other hand, there were constraints in relation to its initial 21 points out in a study carried out in the Amazon Region that the regionalization process in the states was directed to the organization of networks and flows, which also occurred in the regions studied here, in addition to the expanded installed capacity.…”

“…Moreover, in terms of financing, there are no definitions of possible financial arrangements, especially in the (international and/or interstate) border area 14,21 . Another important aspect is that the strong federal induction for the establishment of thematic networks may have been a constraint for the order of regional priorities.…”

Health Policy on the pages of Revista de Saúde Pública

“…In the last 20 years, many topics have been published in the pages of RSP, such as: intergovernmental relations in the backdrop of Brazilian federalism 55 ; health policies and equality assurance 4 , 17 ; decentralization 1 , 9 and regionalization of health services 28 ; regional governance 85 ; use of information for decision-making 23 ; private health sector 12 , 14 , 44 , 50 , 80 , 94 ; and public-private relations 71 , 81 .…”

Óbices da governança pública e sua influência sobre a atenção à saúde bucal no Estado de Santa Catarina, Brasil

“…Há uma mistura entre competências comuns e competências concorrentes e/ou específicas de cada esfera. A formulação de políticas é competência comum das três esferas e tem sido compartilhada atualmente por meio das Comissões Intergestores 10,30,31 .…”