2015
DOI: 10.1134/s0036024415080075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Features of the concentration dependences of the surface tension of water suspensions of bentonites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the literature, the appearance of the silt particles first causes the decrease in the surface tension–to the minimum. The increase in the concentration of the particles in the suspension results in the following increase in surface tension, up to the value similar to that of pure water [ 60 , 61 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the literature, the appearance of the silt particles first causes the decrease in the surface tension–to the minimum. The increase in the concentration of the particles in the suspension results in the following increase in surface tension, up to the value similar to that of pure water [ 60 , 61 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, it slowly increases with increasing kaolinite content. According to a previous study, Dadashev et al (2015) found that the surface tension of a bentonite suspension system showed a minimum between 3% and 5% of bentonite solids. Similarly, in this paper, a similar phenomenon was found with the ultrafine kaolinite particles that were used as the research object.…”
Section: Pulpmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…According to a test method mentioned in previous studies (Dadashev et al 2015;Zhou and Dong 2016), the surface tension tests were performed using the Wilhelmy Hoist method. The surface tension of the ultrafine kaolinite suspension was measured with a surface tensiometer (Kruss K100, Germany).…”
Section: Surface Tension and Froth Layer Properties Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, after a drying process, the height of the specimen is greater than 20.0 mm (initial height), and the radial size of the specimen is less than 61.8 mm. Based on previous studies, the authors think that during the process of drying, pores are contracted after the water is discharged, and contraction stress on the pore is applied because of the surface tension of water, which intensifies the shrinkage of the pore (Dadashev & Dzhambulatov, 2015). Moreover, since some non-recoverable displacement is destined to occur in the drying process, the vertical swelling capacity of the specimen is greater than that of the radial after the first cycle ( Komine & Ogata, 1994;Steiner, 1993).…”
Section: Swelling Under Different Drying-wetting Cyclesmentioning
confidence: 99%