2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2004.06.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Features of promising technologies for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

30
2,612
1
190

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5,319 publications
(2,996 citation statements)
references
References 120 publications
30
2,612
1
190
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to the composition of other important ethanol feedstocks like corn (Marshall and Sugg 2009;Agbogbo and Wenger 2007) and sugar cane (Hayes 1982), the cassava plant is favorable for production of ethanol of right quality and quantity (Ziska et al 2009). The low amount of reducing sugars obtained from roots during the initial hours of hydrolysis may be attributed to the preparation procedure since they were not crushed but chopped, further confirming the importance of the preparative steps for hydrolysis of the different feedstocks (Ziska et al 2009;Mosier et al 2005). Obtaining high initial levels of reducing sugars in peels and stems compared to roots, along with the stringent preparative procedures required, illustrates the difficulty of using cellulosic feedstocks for ethanol production.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Compared to the composition of other important ethanol feedstocks like corn (Marshall and Sugg 2009;Agbogbo and Wenger 2007) and sugar cane (Hayes 1982), the cassava plant is favorable for production of ethanol of right quality and quantity (Ziska et al 2009). The low amount of reducing sugars obtained from roots during the initial hours of hydrolysis may be attributed to the preparation procedure since they were not crushed but chopped, further confirming the importance of the preparative steps for hydrolysis of the different feedstocks (Ziska et al 2009;Mosier et al 2005). Obtaining high initial levels of reducing sugars in peels and stems compared to roots, along with the stringent preparative procedures required, illustrates the difficulty of using cellulosic feedstocks for ethanol production.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Examples include physical (e.g., limited pyrolysis and mechanical disruption/comminution, Mosier et al, 2005), physicochemical (e.g., steam explosion, ammonia fiber explosion, Grous et al, 1986;Mes-Hartree et al, 1988), chemical (e.g., acid hydrolysis, alkaline hydrolysis, high temperature organic solvent pretreatment, oxidative delignification, Chum et al, 1988;Gierer and Noren, 1982;Zhang et al, 2007), and biological (e.g., lignin degradation by white-and soft-rot fungi, Hatakka, 1983;Lee, 1997) methods. In all cases, upon sufficient removal of the lignin, there was also substantial degradation of lignin and in many cases there was substantial loss in fermentable sugar content of the residual polysaccharides (Galbe and Zacchi, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These pretreatments include dilute acid (Lloyd and Wyman 2005;Saha et al 2005;Schell et al 2003), hot water (Liu and Wyman 2004;Ruiz et al 2013), ammonia fiber expansion (Hoover et al 2014;Lau et al 2008;Murnen et al 2007), steam explosion (Grous et al 1986;Kaar et al 1998), lime (Chang et al 1997;Kim and Holtzapple 2005), organic solvent (Zhang et al 2007;Zhao et al 2009b), and pyrolysis and mechanical disruption (Mosier et al 2005). In all these treatments, the substantial degradation of lignin is accompanied by considerable reduction in fermentable sugar content of the feedstock, resulting in a loss of 20-35% of the mass of lignocellulose (Galbe and Zacchi 2007;Lee et al 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%