2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2008.04.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feasibility of Essure Placement in Intrauterine Device Users

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, laparoscopic methods of tubal interruption became the preferred minimally invasive approach for permanent female sterilization 13 . Currently, there is a global consensus that the hysteroscopy approach is the ideal procedure for permanent contraception or family planning 14–19 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a result, laparoscopic methods of tubal interruption became the preferred minimally invasive approach for permanent female sterilization 13 . Currently, there is a global consensus that the hysteroscopy approach is the ideal procedure for permanent contraception or family planning 14–19 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The contraceptive efficacy of hysteroscopic sterilization has been well documented 15–19 . New methods for hysteroscopic transcervical sterilization include the insertion of microinserts into the tubal ostia, causing proximal tubal occlusion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A few small retrospective feasibility studies elucidated the advantage to leave the IUD in place, but their outcomes were also less successful [6,7].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies included unilateral placement rates in women who had previous salpingectomies, 13,22,48 so these placement rates were omitted from the total denominators and numerators as necessary. Eight articles 9,10,17,19,25,26,30,56 only reported bilateral placement rates after more than one attempt. In these cases, the placement rate was recalculated using the data supplied in the article for the first attempt.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%