2015
DOI: 10.1071/hc15057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feasibility of an after-school group-based exercise and lifestyle programme to improve cardiorespiratory fitness and health in less-active Pacific and Maori adolescents

Abstract: INTRODUCTION: Obesity and low levels of physical activity are increasing among Pacific and Māori adolescents in New Zealand.AIM: To assess the feasibility of an after-school exercise and lifestyle programme to improve cardiorespiratory fitness, health and usual activity in less-active Pacific and Māori adolescents over six weeks.METHODS: Eighteen less-active secondary school students participated. The six-week programme included 3 x 1.5 hour exercise and healthy lifestyle sessions per week. Outcomes included e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A previously used [20] modified version of the checklist was used for simplicity and clarity: instead of calculating a range of potential study powers in Item 27, we determined if each study performed a power calculation (1 = yes, 0 = no), thus making 28 the highest possible score for the checklist. Downs and Black scores were assigned to the following score ranges, according to Hooper et al [21]: excellent (26)(27)(28); good (20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25); fair (15)(16)(17)(18)(19); and poor (≤14). Any discrepancies in the article screening, data extraction and synthesis, or quality and risk of bias assessment phases were discussed and resolved with a third reviewer (JLW).…”
Section: Quality Assessment and Risk Of Biasmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…A previously used [20] modified version of the checklist was used for simplicity and clarity: instead of calculating a range of potential study powers in Item 27, we determined if each study performed a power calculation (1 = yes, 0 = no), thus making 28 the highest possible score for the checklist. Downs and Black scores were assigned to the following score ranges, according to Hooper et al [21]: excellent (26)(27)(28); good (20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25); fair (15)(16)(17)(18)(19); and poor (≤14). Any discrepancies in the article screening, data extraction and synthesis, or quality and risk of bias assessment phases were discussed and resolved with a third reviewer (JLW).…”
Section: Quality Assessment and Risk Of Biasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An additional two articles were identified via reference list scoping of identified full-text articles. Of these 11 articles, six met the inclusion criteria and were included for qualitative synthesis in the present systematic review [22][23][24][25][26][27]. The six articles described outcomes from five independent programs or initiatives.…”
Section: Identification Of Included Articlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A feasibility study of an after-school group exercise programme for underactive Māori and Pacific high school students was successful in getting the young people to participate and demonstrated some improvement in cardiorespiratory markers, hence warranting further investigation. 8 In a Viewpoint article, Perez and Kidd discuss the untapped community-based resource of using peer support workers in mental health care, possibly working through non-government organisations. 9 While acknowledging the potential barriers of lack of training and funding, peer support workers can assist patients with long-term moderate to severe mental illness to engage with primary health care services and keep appointments.…”
Section: T His Issue Of the Journal Of Primary Healthmentioning
confidence: 99%