2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2020.101818
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maboo wirriya, be healthy: Community-directed development of an evidence-based diabetes prevention program for young Aboriginal people in a remote Australian town

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There was evidence of already existing readiness by the community to receive and facilitate the program. This aligns with previous reports that highlight the benefits of community-owned programs in remote Aboriginal settings [37][38][39]. Community-owned programs that embraced the authority and autonomy shared across community members were highlighted as successful and effective in the Australian setting [40][41][42][43].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…There was evidence of already existing readiness by the community to receive and facilitate the program. This aligns with previous reports that highlight the benefits of community-owned programs in remote Aboriginal settings [37][38][39]. Community-owned programs that embraced the authority and autonomy shared across community members were highlighted as successful and effective in the Australian setting [40][41][42][43].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Co-design is considered best practice in research involving Indigenous peoples, and defined as meaningful end-user engagement in research design with engagement across all stages of the research process, with clear guidelines in New Zealand, Australia and Canada [41][42][43]. As evidenced by a diabetes prevention program for Aboriginal people in Western Australia, direction from community was vital for ensuring relevant application of previous research and effectiveness [44]. .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One pervasive attitude was that healthy eating has negative financial impacts primarily due to the price of substituting healthier foods for unhealthy foods. Price has previously been identified as a major barrier to healthy eating in the US [ 6 , 8 , 12 , 13 , 14 ] and outside of the US [ 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 ]. In this study, participants shopped at discount stores or outside of their local community (i.e., outshopping) to obtain better prices and quality foods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Residents of rural and remote environments in Canada, Uganda, Australia, and the Pacific Islands countries reported that EDNP foods are more available due to increased trade. Consequently, EDNP foods are considered a barrier to the consumption of healthy traditional foods in their respective cultures [ 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 ]. Healthy eating promotions in these remote locations encourage the intake of traditional healthy foods shared with family and friends for the prevention of obesity and chronic disease [ 18 , 21 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation