2007 7th IEEE Conference on Nanotechnology (IEEE NANO) 2007
DOI: 10.1109/nano.2007.4601264
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fault tolerant structures for nanoscale gates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All the individual circuits should be evaluated. The initial populations are evaluated by the simple error function as illustrated in equation (4). After the evaluation of the initial populations, the individuals with the best fitness will be selected as the representations of their own populations.…”
Section: The Negatively-correlated Evolutionary Algorithm Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All the individual circuits should be evaluated. The initial populations are evaluated by the simple error function as illustrated in equation (4). After the evaluation of the initial populations, the individuals with the best fitness will be selected as the representations of their own populations.…”
Section: The Negatively-correlated Evolutionary Algorithm Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, higher density also increases the electrical, manufacturing and reliability complexities of the integrated circuits [2]. The shrinking of the components near to the atomic scale increases the fault probability of the electronic devices [3] [4]. For electronic systems especially those working in harsh environments, reliability is the key.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, when taking into account the devices forming the gates, this result can change, e.g., it can reverse in certain cases when using single-electron technology [10]. Reliability analyses were made for NANDand MAJ-based multiplexing schemes with low and medium redundancy factors (3 to 3000), using various methods to compute or estimate the system reliability: analytical modelling [11], [12], [8], [9], [13], probability transfer matrix [14], [10], probabilistic model checking [15], [16], Monte Carlo simulations [10], [17] or Bayesian networks [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All of the above mentioned works consider that gates fail with the same probability, with the exception of [10], where the gates are implemented in Single-Electron Tunnelling (SET) technology, and [17], [18], where manufacturing variability effects on the multiplexing scheme are investigated. Our work also considers gates failing with different probabilities, but from a different perspective, and as an effect of a different Figure 2: Multiplexing unit reliability contribution in a highly faulty system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A potential alternative to majority gates is the averaging (AVG) cell [7]- [9], which exhibits higher reliability at lower cost by computing the average of the input replicas instead of relying on majority voting. Moreover, as suggested in previous paper [10], for high fault rates AVG requires a reasonable redundancy level, thus area overhead, when compared with modular redundancy (MR) or NAND multiplexing. Working with the averaging technique variations in opposite directions can be compensated and thus reduce the output probability of error.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%