1997
DOI: 10.1109/54.587743
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fault-secure parity prediction arithmetic operators

Abstract: INTERNATIONAL STANDARD SERIAL NUMBERS (Translation and Original): 0740-7475Although parity prediction arithmetic operators are compatible with systems checked by parity codes, they are not secure against single faults. The authors determine the necessary conditions for fault secureness and derive designs embodying these conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To assist us in selecting the assertions to be included in the assertion checker, we use transient fault simulations using sample segments of real applications and take into consideration only the faults which propagate all the way to the architectural states of the processor. This differs from the experimental methodology followed in almost all previous CED schemes proposed [1], [3], [5], [8], [11], [12], where random vectors are used as inputs of the combinational circuits and all the faults which propagate to the outputs of the combinational portion are considered important. The methodology followed in this paper is similar to the one used in [6] for logic derating.…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To assist us in selecting the assertions to be included in the assertion checker, we use transient fault simulations using sample segments of real applications and take into consideration only the faults which propagate all the way to the architectural states of the processor. This differs from the experimental methodology followed in almost all previous CED schemes proposed [1], [3], [5], [8], [11], [12], where random vectors are used as inputs of the combinational circuits and all the faults which propagate to the outputs of the combinational portion are considered important. The methodology followed in this paper is similar to the one used in [6] for logic derating.…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…For control logic circuits, codeword based schemes have been proposed. Codes like parity [8], [11], [12], Berger [3] and Bose-Lin [1] are predicted for the outputs of the circuit and the codes of real-time outputs are matched against the predicted codes. These techniques for control logic circuits are viable for mission critical applications where reliability is of primary concern and area, timing and power take second place.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[36][37][38][39][40]) can be more lightweight and offer less expensive solutions. In the present paper we show that even with this basic and nonoptimized detection scheme the rollback recovery will require less overhead than feed-forward fault-tolerant techniques.…”
Section: Detection Blockmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several concurrent error detectable adders using parity bits have been proposed [8]- [11]. In [8], a fault-secure ripple carry adder is shown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%