2017
DOI: 10.1002/jssc.201601021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast separation of flavonoids by supercritical fluid chromatography using a column packed with a sub-2 μm particle stationary phase

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of different chromatographic columns for the separation of seven flavonoids. Four different stationary phases are available, including bridged ethyl hybrid, BEH and the same hybrid phase modified with 2-ethylpyridine, CSH fluorophenyl, and HSS C SB. The analytes included calycosin, genistein, medicarpin, calycosin-7-O-β-d-glucoside, formononetin, formononetin-7-O-β-d-glucoside, and liquiritigenin. The CSH fluorophenyl column was determined to be the most sui… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In SFC, a decrease of the temperature leads typically to an increase of the mobile phase density and thus to faster elution of the compounds. However, in subcritical conditions with high modifier concentrations, prediction of temperature influence is not that simple and, as reported by different studies, the influence of temperature on the retention time can change during the gradient, related to fluid compressibility changes [20,[35][36][37]. As shown in Figure 2, this trend was observed also in the presented study.…”
Section: F I G U R E 1 Chemical Structures Of the Major Compounds Insupporting
confidence: 70%
“…In SFC, a decrease of the temperature leads typically to an increase of the mobile phase density and thus to faster elution of the compounds. However, in subcritical conditions with high modifier concentrations, prediction of temperature influence is not that simple and, as reported by different studies, the influence of temperature on the retention time can change during the gradient, related to fluid compressibility changes [20,[35][36][37]. As shown in Figure 2, this trend was observed also in the presented study.…”
Section: F I G U R E 1 Chemical Structures Of the Major Compounds Insupporting
confidence: 70%
“…To model the retention and separation behavior, a CCD was employed to evaluate the pressure, temperature, and amount of modifier. These factors are known to influence the elution strength of CO 2 ‐based MPs [25–27]. Supporting Information Figure S4 presents the chromatograms according to the conditions determined by the CCD.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within these ranges, and for temperatures between 25 and 50°C, the retention factors decreased as the pressure and percentage of the modifier increased for all analytes (therefore these factors have negative coefficients in the model) and increased with temperature (temperature has a positive coefficient). This behavior is expected because in a supercritical fluid, the density increases proportionally with an increase in pressure and a temperature decrease, thereby shifting to a more liquid‐like state or subcritical condition [26,27]. Usually, the higher the density, the more soluble the analytes become.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We then examined the effect of column temperature between 35 and 55°C to optimize the separation and stability of the stationary phase. As shown in Figure C, the resolutions of the 4GMV and SGH signals decreased as the temperature increased, which corresponds with previously reported results . Thus, based on the various resolutions and retention times observed over this temperature range, 35°C was selected as the optimal temperature for subsequent experiments.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%