2001
DOI: 10.1093/erae/28.1.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Farmer response to policies promoting organic farming technologies in Finland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
98
1
8

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 145 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
7
98
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Primarily, there was a consideration of the positive effect of subsidies to support organic agriculture on the implementation of the organic production technology (see Pietola and Lansink 2001;Jánský and Živělová 2007;Kumbhakar et al 2009). The said subsidies were included in the model in several alternative forms -in the form of the total volume of subsidies obtained per hectare of the farmed land in time "t -1" (SH k,t-1 ), and in the form of the average amount of subsidy rates announced per hectare of agricultural land in time "t" (ASR k,t ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Primarily, there was a consideration of the positive effect of subsidies to support organic agriculture on the implementation of the organic production technology (see Pietola and Lansink 2001;Jánský and Živělová 2007;Kumbhakar et al 2009). The said subsidies were included in the model in several alternative forms -in the form of the total volume of subsidies obtained per hectare of the farmed land in time "t -1" (SH k,t-1 ), and in the form of the average amount of subsidy rates announced per hectare of agricultural land in time "t" (ASR k,t ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In accordance with Pietola and Lansink (2001), labour productivity (PWU k,t ) and land productivity (PL k,t ) were also included in the probit model, with a presumed negative effect on the implementation of the organic manner of farming. Kumbhakar et al (2009) also define technical effectiveness (TEF k,t ) as a factor for the transition to the organic farming, with a presumed positive effect, and the experience of the farmer, which was modelled through the use of proxy variables of the duration of the existence of the agricultural business (OF k,t ) and the age of the farmer (OLF k,t ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Jsou jimi například snižující se ceny konvenční produkce a rostoucí finanční podpora ekologického zemědělství (Pietola a Oude Lansink 2001).…”
Section: úVodunclassified
“…V obilninách je nižší zastoupení pšenice, ale vyšší žita a ovsa (obrázek 6). (Pietola a Oude Lansink, 2001, Lesjak, 2008, Rozman et al, 2013, je tato skutečnost i v souladu s konstatováním, že současné dotace do EZ ovlivňují biodiverzitu zemědělských plodin (Bengtsson, et al, 2005, Nastis et al, 2013. Zároveň je dalším potvrzením významu dotací pro rozvoj ekologického zemědělství v Evropě, zatímco například USA historicky spoléhalo spíše na vliv poptávky jako hnací motor rozvoje bioprodukce (Lohr a Salomonsson, 2000).…”
Section: Ekologické Zemědělství V čEské Republiceunclassified