2015
DOI: 10.1097/aci.0000000000000143
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Farm animal models of organic dust exposure and toxicity

Abstract: Purpose of review Modern food animal production is a major contributor to the global economy, owing to advanced intensive indoor production facilities aimed at increasing market readiness and profit. Consequences of these advances are accumulation of dusts, gases and microbial products that diminish air quality within production facilities. Chronic inhalation exposure contributes to onset and exacerbation of respiratory symptoms and diseases in animals and workers. This article reviews literature regarding con… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 111 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many workers reported occupational health problems associated with working in a CAFO including burning eyes, muscular pain, headaches, coughing, nausea, nasal congestion, and sneezing. Consistent with previous studies, being a current smoker increased the risk of reporting occupational allergies [ 20 ], and the longer a person worked at the CAFO, the more likely they were to report coughing [ 5 , 18 , 19 , 24 , 32 ]. Clearly, there is a need to improve the work environment within swine CAFOs to improve worker perceived health and reduce the potential for occupational injuries.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many workers reported occupational health problems associated with working in a CAFO including burning eyes, muscular pain, headaches, coughing, nausea, nasal congestion, and sneezing. Consistent with previous studies, being a current smoker increased the risk of reporting occupational allergies [ 20 ], and the longer a person worked at the CAFO, the more likely they were to report coughing [ 5 , 18 , 19 , 24 , 32 ]. Clearly, there is a need to improve the work environment within swine CAFOs to improve worker perceived health and reduce the potential for occupational injuries.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…A specific concern with CAFO facilities is the potential capacity for the evolution and spread of novel diseases due to limited air spaces and waste removal practices [ 7 , 23 ]. Among swine production workers, these exposures may result in chronic and acute respiratory conditions such as asthma, bronchitis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), coughing, hypersensitivity pneumonitis, throat irritation, sinus problems such as sneezing, noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL), and increased missed work days [ 5 , 18 , 19 , 24 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The materials used in construction or bedding can also generate welfare problems, on the one hand for animal safety and on the other as a potential vector of diseases or parasites. Small particles forming dust can cause respiratory problems, for humans [76] but also for animals such as pigs and calves [77].…”
Section: Bedding and Objects In Animal Accommodationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clearly, the study at hand is limited to those observations made in cultured epithelial cell monolayers. Inhalation of organic dusts results in a substantial cumulative lung inflammatory response (McClendon, Gerald, Waterman 2015). Pro-inflammatory cytokines are generated from the epithelium and resident macrophages, resulting in the recruitment of neutrophils and lymphocytes to the lung (Charavaryamath and Singh 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%