Family feedback in Child Welfare Services: A systematic review of measures

Abstract

Background: Assessing family feedback in Child Welfare Services is embedded in familycentered practice, and the availability of validated, reliable instruments to perform this evaluation is essential for front-line practitioners, managers, and policymakers. Nonetheless, to date, no study has systematically identified and analyzed the measures in this field.Objectives: A systematic review of the literature following the PRISMA guidelines was conducted to identify, describe and conceptually and psychometrically assess all of the published measures of family feedback in Child Welfare Services.Method: A search of the measures published in peer-reviewed scientific journals in English, Spanish, Portuguese, Italian, and French from 1980 to October 2013 was performed. Ten electronic databases and reference lists of relevant studies were consulted. In total, 13 studies including eight instruments were identified and analyzed.Results: Most studies omitted information regarding the descriptive characteristics of the instruments and made no reference to a conceptual model. In most cases, the development and validation processes of the instruments and their psychometric characteristics were insufficiently reported. Additionally, some relevant elements of family-centered practice were frequently omitted in the dimensions of the questionnaires. Conclusions:The scarcity of validated measures to evaluate family feedback in Child Welfare Services demands further research to develop new instruments that overcome these limitations. Recommendations for designing and validating future instruments are provided.

“Family Education and Support” program for families at psychosocial risk: The role of implementation process

“…This responsiveness constitutes a key element for implementation process, although it has not been exhaustively examined and there is still not a golden standard way to assess it (Oats et al, 2014;Small et al, 2009;Staudt, 2001). Thisresearch and practice gap is probably explained by the inability to give families a voice regarding their experiences with parenting programs, which is an essential element to empower at-risk parents (Ayala-Nunes, Jiménez, Hidalgo, & Jesus, 2014;Baker, 2007;Daly, 2007;Tilbury, Osmond, & Crawford, 2010).…”

Exploring the needs of parents for achieving reunification: The views of foster children, birth family and social workers in Spain

“…The research is beginning to reflect a paradigm change in intervention in and support for families at social risk (Amorós et al, 2009;Canali et al, 2001;Rodrigo, Cabrera, Martín-Quintana, & Máiquez, 2009;) that enables a positive focus for family intervention, potentiating the parents' strengths rather than simply attempting to eliminate their deficits Del Valle, López, Montserrat, & Bravo, 2009;Milani, Serbati, Ius, Di Masi, & Zanon, 2013;Proctor et al, 2011;Walsh, 2002). As Osterling and Han (2011) and Ayala-Nunes, Jiménez, Hidalgo, and Jesus (2014) have shown, empowerment is seen as a relevant factor for parents to be able to assume their responsibilities. The Child Welfare Information Gateway (2011) recommends empowering these families through training programs on the part of children's protective services, including at the moment of reunification.…”

Parental engagement in child protection assessment: A qualitative analysis of worker and parent perspectives

“…Morris (2012) states that in order to promote effectiveness in social services, there is a need for knowledge about the lived experiences of families who use care and protection services. Studies about service user feedback may serve as a means to empower parents and to give them a voice with regard to their experiences with services (Ayala-Nunes et al, 2014). Dawson and Berry (2012) emphasise that services can only be effective when clients participate in them fully.…”