Family education and support for families at psychosocial risk in Europe: Evidence from a survey of international experts

Abstract

There is overwhelming consensus among policy makers, academics, and professionals about the need to support families in their childrearing tasks. Consequently, European countries have been encouraged to develop family support interventions aimed at guaranteeing children's rights, targeting particularly those children in situations of psychosocial risk. While a certain amount of evidence exists regarding how family support is generally delivered in certain European countries, with a particular focus on parenting initiatives, this paper aims to take existing evidence one step further by providing an updated review focusing on two core components of the Council of Europe's Recommendation on Positive Parenting: families at psychosocial risk as the target population, and family education and support initiatives as the delivery format. The scope of the study was therefore broad, in both geographical and conceptual terms. An online survey was conducted with experts from 19 European countries to gather information regarding how they perceive family education and support initiatives for families at psychosocial risk. Both quantitative and qualitative data were analysed by computing frequencies/percentages and by following a thematic synthesis method, respectively. The results revealed both similarities and disparities as regards provider profiles, intervention characteristics, and quality standards. Practical implications are discussed, such as the need to diversify initiatives for at‐risk families in accordance with the tenets of progressive universalism, the ongoing need for an evidence‐based, pluralistic approach to programmes, and the skills and qualifications required in the family support workforce. This study constitutes a first step towards building a common family support framework at a European level, which would encompass family support and parenting policies aimed at families at psychosocial risk.

Testing the Effects of COVID-19 Confinement in Spanish Children: The Role of Parents’ Distress, Emotional Problems and Specific Parenting

“…Based on the foregoing, the current results may help to better inform researchers, social agents and policy makers to develop effective guidelines for future outbreaks with the aim of promoting positive parenting [ 63 ] and fostering children’s well-being in the family. To this end, prevention programs specifically targeted to family needs within the context of a health-related crisis are particularly needed.…”

Family Context Assessment in Middle Childhood: A Tool Supporting Social, Educational, and Public Health Interventions

“…Another aspect to bear in mind when assessing the results of this study is that the data provided by the scale may be extremely useful for the correct design of individual interventions with both at-risk and non-at-risk families. This is in line with the Council of Europe Recommendation on positive parenting, in relation to the implementation of programs and initiatives to support parenting [64]. In relation to the design of preventive family intervention policies, the instrument may help detect trends and childrearing patterns in large-scale populations, allowing to know those variables of the family context susceptible to be included in the intervention programs.…”

Effectiveness of Scene‐Based Psychodramatic Family Therapy (SB‐PFT) in adolescents with behavioural problems

“…Interventions designed specifically to meet the needs of adolescents with behavioural problems could be an effective measure for promoting their and their families’ healthy adjustment (Sexton, ). Consequently, current European public policies include interventions focused on reducing problematic behaviours, as well as promoting adolescent and family well‐being (Jiménez, Antolín, Lorence, & Hidalgo, ). This study offers evidence regarding the impact of one specific intervention on adolescents with behavioural problems: Scene‐Based Psychodramatic Family Therapy (SB‐PFT; Maya, Jiménez, Lorence, del Moral, & Hidalgo, ; Maya, Lorence, Hidalgo, & Jiménez, ).…”